Canberra MRT station has been listed as one of the
Engineering and technology good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 9, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
A fact from Canberra MRT station appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 13 May 2020 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in Singaporean English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, centre, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
On 7 January 2018, it was proposed that this article be moved from Canberra MRT Station to Canberra MRT station. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Canberra MRT Station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:13, 30 July 2017 (UTC) – Paine Ellsworth put'r there 02:36, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Aljunied MRT Station which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 09:31, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
I guess the mention to aust capital canberra is based on this http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-news/singapore-calls-new-mrt-station-canberra-20140628-zspsl.html
which i personally think it is written based on aust POV of the times, which may not be a little compliant to WP:NPOV.
well it is named after the area canberra, then canberra is named after canberra , aust , yes, but the mrt is not directly named after it. please read article carefully
plus for NS 12 , there is no case for NS 13 ... as it is just can be considered trivia, can put in another section is necessary, but better to be linked to main NSL article
Just my 2 cents, opinions much thanked Quek157 ( talk) 16:42, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
hi. 1.02 editor do see the edit i undone to get the context and I am getting consensus for undoing that edit. I am also giving my detailed reply to the ip address editer to why I undone the context. I also not sure what ns 13 means but that edit mentioned that Canberra should be ns13 if not changed of mrt map. do reference to the edit Quek157 ( talk) 07:17, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
shall we put both as a trivia or interesting fact session with proper citations Quek157 ( talk) 08:52, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
added named after canberra with 2 sources Quek157 ( talk) 16:08, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
@ 1.02 editor and KN2731: Hi editors, if /info/en/?search=Guanglan_Road_station and /info/en/?search=Tryvandsh%C3%B8iden_(station) can be GA class, I don't think after all these editions this is far apart . can we try to push this a little and I can help to address doubts -- Quek157 ( talk) 16:05, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
@ Quek157: ok then, do you want to nominate the article? 1.02 editor ( C651 set 217/ 218) 12:10, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
@ 1.02 editor and KN2731:In retrospect, the previous few GA I noted are really old in GA review, as it is 2011, a 2017 GA article of station is /info/en/?search=Fenchurch_Street_railway_station which this page still have somewhere to go...so will hold the entire GA nomination but will still make edits -- Quek157 ( talk) 15:03, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
will see how to edit up to compliance Quek157 ( talk) 08:18, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
{{
cite web}}
: Empty citation (
help) is optional.(Comment): Some redundant references can be taken off but mostly in place
(Comment): Meet I think
(Comment): Meet I think
(Comment): Meet I think (but may still have minor errors)
(Comment): Meet I think - I am trying to insert a map (but now still blocked)
(Comment): Meet I think So now is just a borderline "B" article. Appreciate help to address all the rest and then we can then do GA. Thanks! -- Quek157 ( talk) 10:58, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
@ Quek157: do you still want GA? 1.02 editor ( C651 set 217/ 218) 00:50, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
Instead of GA, is this a B class article now? I am hoping for 3rd party review. I think first B class then GAN will be better? -- Quek157 ( talk) 15:12, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Hey editors! I have heavily modified the article to ensure a balance between formality in its presentation for readers (Not too detailed) as well as spelling out useful details that transport enthusiast might want to know (Not too general). I'm hopeful this page will push to an A grade as it undergoes review again. Additionally, please archive references so that dead links can still be readable in future, which I have already done so. Yenwei ( talk) 11:04, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
I noted with thanks that 1.02 editor moved gallery to commons . do note that all model pics are in danger of removal due to copyright infringement. I don't think it will affect as I can still add as external image . just fyi. I agree to deletion as no way hdb will give orts permission Quek157 ( talk) 09:33, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: SounderBruce ( talk · contribs) 02:36, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
I'll give the nominators a few days to work on this, but even after all these comments there are still other issues to bring up. I suggest looking at existing GAs on future stations (of which I have written a few, like U District station) to learn the proper way of laying out a future-proof (or rather future-ready) article. Sounder Bruce 02:36, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
noiminator note
I will do the necessary edits asap. do pardon me for a little inaction. will do clean-up today. thanks for all the guidance. very useful --
Quek157 (
talk) 05:39, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
I will continue soon --
Quek157 (
talk) 10:17, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
While most of my points were addressed, the resulting article is still riddled with existing and new grammar issues. Some new passages are even unreferenced and read like a phoned-in school report rather than an encyclopedia entry. The point of a GA review is not to hand-hold editors until their article is up to an acceptable standard, but instead point out small mistakes that help put a final polish on the work; the number of issues listed in my above review was well above the minimum that other reviewers would use to quick-fail a nomination. In addition to the fundamental problems here, the article is likely to undergo massive changes when the station is opened, and I'm not confident it can retain GA status.
As such, I will be closing this review on criteria 1(a) and 1(b), as well as 3(b). I highly suggest that this article undergo a real copyedit from WP:GOCE or a real peer review before re-appearing at GAN. Sounder Bruce 00:27, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
@ 1.02 editor:. see this paragraph. it's what we write here what after the review. seems lta stalking this page " As part of the project, a new 72-metre long rail crossover track will also be constructed north of Canberra MRT Station to connect two existing tracks that lead to and from the station. This crossover track will enhance the resilience of the NSL rail network by allowing trains to cross from one track to another when the need arises. For example, if one side of the tracks develops a fault, trains can temporarily cross over and use the other track to bypass the faulty stretch, hence enabling train services in both directions to remain available. Noise barriers will also be installed at the new rail crossover." Quek157 ( talk) 08:41, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
5. To better facilitate commuter movements and enhance accessibility, Canberra MRT Station will have five entrances linking it to the new housing estates across Canberra Link. There will also be an elevated link bridge across Canberra Link for commuters to directly access the city-bound train platform. The new station will also have covered link-ways to bus stops, pick-up and drop-off points, as well as more than 500 bicycle parks." this one also Quek157 ( talk) 08:42, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Over the term used to describe the manafacturing concerns located at the Yishun industrial park in close proximity to Canberra MRT station (as mentioned in the second paragraph of the 'Location' article), wouldn't it be best to use the term 'companies' instead of 'industries'. This is because the term 'industries' is often used (from my experience) to refer to a line of work as a whole instead of individual business concerns (as it is utilsed in the article), whereas the term 'companies' is often used to describe individual business concerns in general. R22-3877 ( talk) 14:44, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
A user had tried to remove the construction pictures of Canberra station from this article. I am starting this discussion to get opinions on whether we should retain the construction pictures or delete them. I would like to hear your opinions. Please do not attempt further changes until we have a consensus. Thanks. TheGreatSG'rean ( talk) 19:04, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
@ Yenwei: The article hasn't fully stabilised yet, so I would say it's far too premature to make the nomination. Furthermore, the article is far from well-written. I suggest you send it to WP:GOCE for a copyedit and then a peer review before even considering it for GAN. R22-3877 ( talk) 07:23, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Truflip99 ( talk · contribs) 22:56, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Starting review. --
Truflip99 (
talk) 22:56, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Canberra MRT station (NS12) is an elevated Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) station in Sembawang, Singapore. It is the 12th station eastbound on the North South line and is located along Canberra Link at the junction with Canberra Way.-- copy edited
With several green features included in the station during construction-- name a few exmaples
Taking it slow on this one as this article actually needs substantial improvement, and I'd rather make those improvements now than fail it. -- Truflip99 ( talk) 23:27, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
the Draft Master Plan 2013 was officially gazetted to become the Master Plan 2014 in June that year.-- June of that year
in response to these Master Plans-- lower case master plans
On 27 April 2015, LTA awarded China State Construction Engineering Corporation (Singapore Branch) Contract 158 for the Design and Construction of Canberra Station at a sum of S$90 million.-- LTA awarded Contract 158 to China State...
Heavy construction work began on 26 March 2016-- comma after date
Between 18 and 20 May 2019, a 72 m (236 ft) long rail crossover track was constructed at the northern end of Canberra station to connect the two tracks.-- use this convert = {{convert|72|m|ft|adj=mid|-long}}
such as the power outage that occurred on 7 July 2015-- this would be more appropriate in parentheses I think
For the construction team's efforts to integrate landscaping and the use of eco-friendly materials, the station was awarded a Platinum certification under the Building and Construction Authority's new Green Mark scheme for transit stations. Canberra station is the first MRT station to attain such a rating.-- I think this is more appropriate in the next section
More later. -- Truflip99 ( talk) 16:11, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
An estimated 17,000 households will benefit from the station.-- government predictions should be taken with a grain of salt; "is expected to benefit"...; also this sentence is better off as the second sentence in the next paragraph
There are new and forthcoming Housing and Development Board (HDB) public housing developments, private condominiums as well as landed properties (Sembawang Springs Estate) near the station. In addition, it serves Yishun Industrial Park A, which houses mainly manufacturing companies along with the Singapore Civil Defence Force 3rd Division Headquarters and the Yishun Fire Station.-- source?
Canberra Plaza (currently under construction)-- under construciton as of April 2020...
It will be completed by the end of 2019.-- update?
now a subsidiary of Surbana Jurong-- both? if not indicate former or latter
thus the station shapes...-- is shaped
to allow natural light to enter it.-- omit "it"
Louvers were used to provide ventilation.-- used --> installed
The station has five entrances.-- where?
An elevated sheltered footbridge built across Canberra Link-- omit "elevated" as it is understood with footbridge; "across" --> "over"
The artwork in the station, Symbiosis, was painted by Singaporean artist Tan Zi Xi. It aims to emphasise the symbiotic relationship between flora and fauna. Residents and stakeholders from the nearby Sembawang Group Representation Constituency contributed to the artwork by drawing imaginative plants and animals after a workshop that involved a nature walk. Ms Tan developed their drawings further to suit the lively design of the station.-- this is better off in the previous paragraph; omit "Ms"
More later. -- Truflip99 ( talk) 03:07, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
I am satisfied with this article. Passing. -- Truflip99 ( talk) 03:15, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 05:28, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by 1.02 editor ( talk). Self-nominated at 07:21, 9 April 2020 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Canberra MRT station has been listed as one of the
Engineering and technology good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 9, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
A fact from Canberra MRT station appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 13 May 2020 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in Singaporean English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, centre, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
On 7 January 2018, it was proposed that this article be moved from Canberra MRT Station to Canberra MRT station. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Canberra MRT Station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:13, 30 July 2017 (UTC) – Paine Ellsworth put'r there 02:36, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Aljunied MRT Station which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 09:31, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
I guess the mention to aust capital canberra is based on this http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-news/singapore-calls-new-mrt-station-canberra-20140628-zspsl.html
which i personally think it is written based on aust POV of the times, which may not be a little compliant to WP:NPOV.
well it is named after the area canberra, then canberra is named after canberra , aust , yes, but the mrt is not directly named after it. please read article carefully
plus for NS 12 , there is no case for NS 13 ... as it is just can be considered trivia, can put in another section is necessary, but better to be linked to main NSL article
Just my 2 cents, opinions much thanked Quek157 ( talk) 16:42, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
hi. 1.02 editor do see the edit i undone to get the context and I am getting consensus for undoing that edit. I am also giving my detailed reply to the ip address editer to why I undone the context. I also not sure what ns 13 means but that edit mentioned that Canberra should be ns13 if not changed of mrt map. do reference to the edit Quek157 ( talk) 07:17, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
shall we put both as a trivia or interesting fact session with proper citations Quek157 ( talk) 08:52, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
added named after canberra with 2 sources Quek157 ( talk) 16:08, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
@ 1.02 editor and KN2731: Hi editors, if /info/en/?search=Guanglan_Road_station and /info/en/?search=Tryvandsh%C3%B8iden_(station) can be GA class, I don't think after all these editions this is far apart . can we try to push this a little and I can help to address doubts -- Quek157 ( talk) 16:05, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
@ Quek157: ok then, do you want to nominate the article? 1.02 editor ( C651 set 217/ 218) 12:10, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
@ 1.02 editor and KN2731:In retrospect, the previous few GA I noted are really old in GA review, as it is 2011, a 2017 GA article of station is /info/en/?search=Fenchurch_Street_railway_station which this page still have somewhere to go...so will hold the entire GA nomination but will still make edits -- Quek157 ( talk) 15:03, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
will see how to edit up to compliance Quek157 ( talk) 08:18, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
{{
cite web}}
: Empty citation (
help) is optional.(Comment): Some redundant references can be taken off but mostly in place
(Comment): Meet I think
(Comment): Meet I think
(Comment): Meet I think (but may still have minor errors)
(Comment): Meet I think - I am trying to insert a map (but now still blocked)
(Comment): Meet I think So now is just a borderline "B" article. Appreciate help to address all the rest and then we can then do GA. Thanks! -- Quek157 ( talk) 10:58, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
@ Quek157: do you still want GA? 1.02 editor ( C651 set 217/ 218) 00:50, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
Instead of GA, is this a B class article now? I am hoping for 3rd party review. I think first B class then GAN will be better? -- Quek157 ( talk) 15:12, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Hey editors! I have heavily modified the article to ensure a balance between formality in its presentation for readers (Not too detailed) as well as spelling out useful details that transport enthusiast might want to know (Not too general). I'm hopeful this page will push to an A grade as it undergoes review again. Additionally, please archive references so that dead links can still be readable in future, which I have already done so. Yenwei ( talk) 11:04, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
I noted with thanks that 1.02 editor moved gallery to commons . do note that all model pics are in danger of removal due to copyright infringement. I don't think it will affect as I can still add as external image . just fyi. I agree to deletion as no way hdb will give orts permission Quek157 ( talk) 09:33, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: SounderBruce ( talk · contribs) 02:36, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
I'll give the nominators a few days to work on this, but even after all these comments there are still other issues to bring up. I suggest looking at existing GAs on future stations (of which I have written a few, like U District station) to learn the proper way of laying out a future-proof (or rather future-ready) article. Sounder Bruce 02:36, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
noiminator note
I will do the necessary edits asap. do pardon me for a little inaction. will do clean-up today. thanks for all the guidance. very useful --
Quek157 (
talk) 05:39, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
I will continue soon --
Quek157 (
talk) 10:17, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
While most of my points were addressed, the resulting article is still riddled with existing and new grammar issues. Some new passages are even unreferenced and read like a phoned-in school report rather than an encyclopedia entry. The point of a GA review is not to hand-hold editors until their article is up to an acceptable standard, but instead point out small mistakes that help put a final polish on the work; the number of issues listed in my above review was well above the minimum that other reviewers would use to quick-fail a nomination. In addition to the fundamental problems here, the article is likely to undergo massive changes when the station is opened, and I'm not confident it can retain GA status.
As such, I will be closing this review on criteria 1(a) and 1(b), as well as 3(b). I highly suggest that this article undergo a real copyedit from WP:GOCE or a real peer review before re-appearing at GAN. Sounder Bruce 00:27, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
@ 1.02 editor:. see this paragraph. it's what we write here what after the review. seems lta stalking this page " As part of the project, a new 72-metre long rail crossover track will also be constructed north of Canberra MRT Station to connect two existing tracks that lead to and from the station. This crossover track will enhance the resilience of the NSL rail network by allowing trains to cross from one track to another when the need arises. For example, if one side of the tracks develops a fault, trains can temporarily cross over and use the other track to bypass the faulty stretch, hence enabling train services in both directions to remain available. Noise barriers will also be installed at the new rail crossover." Quek157 ( talk) 08:41, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
5. To better facilitate commuter movements and enhance accessibility, Canberra MRT Station will have five entrances linking it to the new housing estates across Canberra Link. There will also be an elevated link bridge across Canberra Link for commuters to directly access the city-bound train platform. The new station will also have covered link-ways to bus stops, pick-up and drop-off points, as well as more than 500 bicycle parks." this one also Quek157 ( talk) 08:42, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Over the term used to describe the manafacturing concerns located at the Yishun industrial park in close proximity to Canberra MRT station (as mentioned in the second paragraph of the 'Location' article), wouldn't it be best to use the term 'companies' instead of 'industries'. This is because the term 'industries' is often used (from my experience) to refer to a line of work as a whole instead of individual business concerns (as it is utilsed in the article), whereas the term 'companies' is often used to describe individual business concerns in general. R22-3877 ( talk) 14:44, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
A user had tried to remove the construction pictures of Canberra station from this article. I am starting this discussion to get opinions on whether we should retain the construction pictures or delete them. I would like to hear your opinions. Please do not attempt further changes until we have a consensus. Thanks. TheGreatSG'rean ( talk) 19:04, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
@ Yenwei: The article hasn't fully stabilised yet, so I would say it's far too premature to make the nomination. Furthermore, the article is far from well-written. I suggest you send it to WP:GOCE for a copyedit and then a peer review before even considering it for GAN. R22-3877 ( talk) 07:23, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Truflip99 ( talk · contribs) 22:56, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Starting review. --
Truflip99 (
talk) 22:56, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Canberra MRT station (NS12) is an elevated Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) station in Sembawang, Singapore. It is the 12th station eastbound on the North South line and is located along Canberra Link at the junction with Canberra Way.-- copy edited
With several green features included in the station during construction-- name a few exmaples
Taking it slow on this one as this article actually needs substantial improvement, and I'd rather make those improvements now than fail it. -- Truflip99 ( talk) 23:27, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
the Draft Master Plan 2013 was officially gazetted to become the Master Plan 2014 in June that year.-- June of that year
in response to these Master Plans-- lower case master plans
On 27 April 2015, LTA awarded China State Construction Engineering Corporation (Singapore Branch) Contract 158 for the Design and Construction of Canberra Station at a sum of S$90 million.-- LTA awarded Contract 158 to China State...
Heavy construction work began on 26 March 2016-- comma after date
Between 18 and 20 May 2019, a 72 m (236 ft) long rail crossover track was constructed at the northern end of Canberra station to connect the two tracks.-- use this convert = {{convert|72|m|ft|adj=mid|-long}}
such as the power outage that occurred on 7 July 2015-- this would be more appropriate in parentheses I think
For the construction team's efforts to integrate landscaping and the use of eco-friendly materials, the station was awarded a Platinum certification under the Building and Construction Authority's new Green Mark scheme for transit stations. Canberra station is the first MRT station to attain such a rating.-- I think this is more appropriate in the next section
More later. -- Truflip99 ( talk) 16:11, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
An estimated 17,000 households will benefit from the station.-- government predictions should be taken with a grain of salt; "is expected to benefit"...; also this sentence is better off as the second sentence in the next paragraph
There are new and forthcoming Housing and Development Board (HDB) public housing developments, private condominiums as well as landed properties (Sembawang Springs Estate) near the station. In addition, it serves Yishun Industrial Park A, which houses mainly manufacturing companies along with the Singapore Civil Defence Force 3rd Division Headquarters and the Yishun Fire Station.-- source?
Canberra Plaza (currently under construction)-- under construciton as of April 2020...
It will be completed by the end of 2019.-- update?
now a subsidiary of Surbana Jurong-- both? if not indicate former or latter
thus the station shapes...-- is shaped
to allow natural light to enter it.-- omit "it"
Louvers were used to provide ventilation.-- used --> installed
The station has five entrances.-- where?
An elevated sheltered footbridge built across Canberra Link-- omit "elevated" as it is understood with footbridge; "across" --> "over"
The artwork in the station, Symbiosis, was painted by Singaporean artist Tan Zi Xi. It aims to emphasise the symbiotic relationship between flora and fauna. Residents and stakeholders from the nearby Sembawang Group Representation Constituency contributed to the artwork by drawing imaginative plants and animals after a workshop that involved a nature walk. Ms Tan developed their drawings further to suit the lively design of the station.-- this is better off in the previous paragraph; omit "Ms"
More later. -- Truflip99 ( talk) 03:07, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
I am satisfied with this article. Passing. -- Truflip99 ( talk) 03:15, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 05:28, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by 1.02 editor ( talk). Self-nominated at 07:21, 9 April 2020 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |