![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
![]() | The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Text from the proposed draft version is insufficiently paraphrased from the source material. Please see WP:CLOSEPARAPHRASE for more information about this requirement. |
- Explain what this article is about as not every editor will be familiar with the subject. Copying the first sentence from the article, for example "Meera Dewan is a social-issue documentary filmmaker based in New Delhi, India." is often enough.
This article is about the Canadian Transportation Agency, an agency of the canadian federal government that provides regulations on various aspects of the Canadian transportation system. They generally have jurisdiction in licencing and regulations for airlines, railways and some marine operations while also performing a consumer rights role in the Rail and air industries.
- Indicate if information should be added to the article or subtracted from it.
The changes that I am proposing update the article to reflect the current state of the agency, its mandate and positioning has changed since the page was last updated.
- Explain in clear words what needs to be changed about the article. Add a suggestion for the changes that can be copy-pasted by the editor if you can.
As an employee of the CTA I have been asked to request that the article for the CTA be updated to reflect the changes that the organization has undergone. Ideally the article would be replaced with the text found below.
↓Suggestions for changes↓
Extended content
|
---|
The Canadian Transportation Agency (CTA) is an independent, quasi-judicial tribunal and regulator that has, with respect to all matters necessary for the exercise of its jurisdiction, all the powers of a superior court. It oversees the Canadian national transportation system, including air, rail, marine and interprovincial bus. It reports to Parliament through the Minister of Transport. The CTA has three mandates:
The CTA's decision-makers are regular Members appointed by the Governor-in–Council, and temporary Members appointed by the Minister of Transport from a Governor-in-Council-approved roster. Members' key functions include making adjudicative rulings, regulations, and regulatory determinations, as well as designating CTA staff to exercise the role of enforcement officers. In May 2016, the Agency initiated the Regulatory Modernization Initiative (RMI) – a full review of all the regulations, guidelines and tools that it administers. During 2017-2018, the Agency completed the first two phases of the Initiative, focusing on accessible transportation and air transportation. Tools To help advance these mandates, the CTA has three tools at its disposal:
Legislation and Regulations Legislation The CTA's responsibilities are primarily set out in the Canada Transportation Act, but it has responsibilities for carrying out provisions of other Acts:
Regulations The CTA has sole responsibility for the following regulations:
The CTA shares responsibility on these regulations with other federal entities:
See also External links - Provide links to sources which support any claims made https://www.otc-cta.gc.ca/eng/national-transportation-system https://www.otc-cta.gc.ca/eng/mandate-tools-values https://www.otc-cta.gc.ca/eng/publication/at-heart-transportation-a-moving-history |
slipslopsloot Slipslopsloot ( talk) 16:40, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Large portions of text from your proposed draft are insufficiently paraphrased from the source material, per WP:CLOSEPARAPHRASE. A list of this text may be found here. Anything added to the article ought to be written in your own words, and text which does not meet this requirement will not be added to the article. Regards, SPINTENDO 21:51, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The reviewer would like to request the editor with a COI attempt to discuss with editors engaged in the subject-area first. |
- Explain what this article is about as not every editor will be familiar with the subject. Copying the first sentence from the article, for example "Meera Dewan is a social-issue documentary filmmaker based in New Delhi, India." is often enough.
This article is about the Canadian Transportation Agency, an agency of the Canadian federal government that provides regulations on various aspects of the Canadian transportation system. They generally have jurisdiction in licensing and regulations for airlines, railways and some marine operations while also performing a consumer rights role in the Rail and air industries.
- Indicate if information should be added to the article or subtracted from it.
This change removes some now factually incorrect information and adds some information about legislation and regulations that the CTA works with.
- Explain in clear words what needs to be changed about the article. Add a suggestion for the changes that can be copy-pasted by the editor if you can.
As an employee of the CTA I have been asked to request that the article for the CTA be updated to reflect the changes that the organization has undergone. I have been asked to remove some now factually incorrect information about the agency's structure and add to the section outlining the agencys legislation and regulations.
SUBTRACT
The Agency is divided into five branches: Chair's Office; Corporate Management Branch; Legal and Alternative Dispute Resolution Services Branch; Dispute Resolution Branch; Industry Regulation and Determinations Branch.
ADD - This section expands upon the agency's legislative and regulatory responsibilities.
Legislation and Regulations Legislation The CTA's responsibilities are primarily set out in the Canada Transportation Act, but it has responsibilities for carrying out provisions of other Acts:
Regulations The CTA has sole responsibility for the following regulations:
The CTA shares responsibility on these regulations with other federal entities:
See also
External links
- Provide links to sources which support any claims made
https://www.otc-cta.gc.ca/eng/national-transportation-system https://www.otc-cta.gc.ca/eng/mandate-tools-values https://www.otc-cta.gc.ca/eng/publication/at-heart-transportation-a-moving-history — Preceding unsigned comment added by Slipslopsloot ( talk • contribs)
May I suggest speaking with the editors at
WikiProject
Canada first, as they would most likely be the best equipped to assist you with this endeavor. If you're unable to make headway with the editors there, please let me know. .
spintendo⋅⋅)
19:00, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
I will do so. Thanks for the help! slipslopsloot 08:18, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
![]() | The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
The following statement is inaccurate:
The Federal Court of Appeal dismissed the advocacy group's request in August 2020, whereupon the advocacy group appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada.
The correct chronology of events is as follows:
A judge of the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed APR's request for a temporary (interlocutory) injunction. The judge declined to dismiss the case itself, which seeks a permanent injunction. [1] [2]
APR asked Supreme Court of Canada to hear an appeal from dismissal of the temporary (interlocutory) injunction. (The link in the article to this leave to appeal application is correct, but the editor misunderstood what it was referring it.) This leave to appeal is not about the permanent injunction.
Federal Court of Appeal judge clears path for hearing of APR's case, holding that the issue of reasonable apprehension of bias of the Canadian Transportation Agency merits a full hearing. [3] [4]
Gabor Lukacs (
talk)
16:09, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
References
The Federal Court of Appeal dismissed the advocacy group's request in August 2020, whereupon the advocacy group appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada. [1]
The correct statement is:
In May 2020, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed the advocacy group's request for a temporary (interlocutory) injunction, but declined to dismiss the case itself that sought a permanent injunction. [2] [3] In August 2020, the advocacy group asked the Supreme Court of Canada to hear an appeal with respect the the denial of the temporary injunction. [4] In October 2020, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal cleared the path for hearing of advocacy group's case, holding that the issue of reasonable apprehension of bias of the Canadian Transportation Agency merits a full hearing. [5] [6]
Gabor Lukacs ( talk) 00:10, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
References
[39] Because it says that APR’s application for judicial review does not relate to a matter that is amenable to judicial review, the CTA argues in its memorandum of fact and law that the application should be dismissed. There is, however, no motion currently before this Court seeking such relief, and any such motion would, in any event, have to be decided by a panel of judges, rather than a single judge. Consequently, I decline to make the order sought.
References
to dismiss the case is not only inaccurate, but may also be libelous.Editors are not allowed to make legal threats on Wikipedia. While I do not think your intention is to issue a legal threat, I think talking about Wikipedia being sued over this content is entering a murky grey-zone that we want to avoid.
The Air Passenger Rights organization has sought leave to appeal a Federal Court of Appeal decision that dismissed the group's attempt to compel the Canadian Transportation Agency to promptly remove a statement on refunds from its website.I interpreted this quote as saying that, in Aug 2020, the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed APR's motion to force CTA to remove the statement about refunds from their website. Upon closer examination of the source, I can see that I was wrong when I included that the ruling came out in August because the source does not verify that information. Thus I have removed the Aug 2020 date.
References
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
![]() | The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Text from the proposed draft version is insufficiently paraphrased from the source material. Please see WP:CLOSEPARAPHRASE for more information about this requirement. |
- Explain what this article is about as not every editor will be familiar with the subject. Copying the first sentence from the article, for example "Meera Dewan is a social-issue documentary filmmaker based in New Delhi, India." is often enough.
This article is about the Canadian Transportation Agency, an agency of the canadian federal government that provides regulations on various aspects of the Canadian transportation system. They generally have jurisdiction in licencing and regulations for airlines, railways and some marine operations while also performing a consumer rights role in the Rail and air industries.
- Indicate if information should be added to the article or subtracted from it.
The changes that I am proposing update the article to reflect the current state of the agency, its mandate and positioning has changed since the page was last updated.
- Explain in clear words what needs to be changed about the article. Add a suggestion for the changes that can be copy-pasted by the editor if you can.
As an employee of the CTA I have been asked to request that the article for the CTA be updated to reflect the changes that the organization has undergone. Ideally the article would be replaced with the text found below.
↓Suggestions for changes↓
Extended content
|
---|
The Canadian Transportation Agency (CTA) is an independent, quasi-judicial tribunal and regulator that has, with respect to all matters necessary for the exercise of its jurisdiction, all the powers of a superior court. It oversees the Canadian national transportation system, including air, rail, marine and interprovincial bus. It reports to Parliament through the Minister of Transport. The CTA has three mandates:
The CTA's decision-makers are regular Members appointed by the Governor-in–Council, and temporary Members appointed by the Minister of Transport from a Governor-in-Council-approved roster. Members' key functions include making adjudicative rulings, regulations, and regulatory determinations, as well as designating CTA staff to exercise the role of enforcement officers. In May 2016, the Agency initiated the Regulatory Modernization Initiative (RMI) – a full review of all the regulations, guidelines and tools that it administers. During 2017-2018, the Agency completed the first two phases of the Initiative, focusing on accessible transportation and air transportation. Tools To help advance these mandates, the CTA has three tools at its disposal:
Legislation and Regulations Legislation The CTA's responsibilities are primarily set out in the Canada Transportation Act, but it has responsibilities for carrying out provisions of other Acts:
Regulations The CTA has sole responsibility for the following regulations:
The CTA shares responsibility on these regulations with other federal entities:
See also External links - Provide links to sources which support any claims made https://www.otc-cta.gc.ca/eng/national-transportation-system https://www.otc-cta.gc.ca/eng/mandate-tools-values https://www.otc-cta.gc.ca/eng/publication/at-heart-transportation-a-moving-history |
slipslopsloot Slipslopsloot ( talk) 16:40, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Large portions of text from your proposed draft are insufficiently paraphrased from the source material, per WP:CLOSEPARAPHRASE. A list of this text may be found here. Anything added to the article ought to be written in your own words, and text which does not meet this requirement will not be added to the article. Regards, SPINTENDO 21:51, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The reviewer would like to request the editor with a COI attempt to discuss with editors engaged in the subject-area first. |
- Explain what this article is about as not every editor will be familiar with the subject. Copying the first sentence from the article, for example "Meera Dewan is a social-issue documentary filmmaker based in New Delhi, India." is often enough.
This article is about the Canadian Transportation Agency, an agency of the Canadian federal government that provides regulations on various aspects of the Canadian transportation system. They generally have jurisdiction in licensing and regulations for airlines, railways and some marine operations while also performing a consumer rights role in the Rail and air industries.
- Indicate if information should be added to the article or subtracted from it.
This change removes some now factually incorrect information and adds some information about legislation and regulations that the CTA works with.
- Explain in clear words what needs to be changed about the article. Add a suggestion for the changes that can be copy-pasted by the editor if you can.
As an employee of the CTA I have been asked to request that the article for the CTA be updated to reflect the changes that the organization has undergone. I have been asked to remove some now factually incorrect information about the agency's structure and add to the section outlining the agencys legislation and regulations.
SUBTRACT
The Agency is divided into five branches: Chair's Office; Corporate Management Branch; Legal and Alternative Dispute Resolution Services Branch; Dispute Resolution Branch; Industry Regulation and Determinations Branch.
ADD - This section expands upon the agency's legislative and regulatory responsibilities.
Legislation and Regulations Legislation The CTA's responsibilities are primarily set out in the Canada Transportation Act, but it has responsibilities for carrying out provisions of other Acts:
Regulations The CTA has sole responsibility for the following regulations:
The CTA shares responsibility on these regulations with other federal entities:
See also
External links
- Provide links to sources which support any claims made
https://www.otc-cta.gc.ca/eng/national-transportation-system https://www.otc-cta.gc.ca/eng/mandate-tools-values https://www.otc-cta.gc.ca/eng/publication/at-heart-transportation-a-moving-history — Preceding unsigned comment added by Slipslopsloot ( talk • contribs)
May I suggest speaking with the editors at
WikiProject
Canada first, as they would most likely be the best equipped to assist you with this endeavor. If you're unable to make headway with the editors there, please let me know. .
spintendo⋅⋅)
19:00, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
I will do so. Thanks for the help! slipslopsloot 08:18, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
![]() | The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
The following statement is inaccurate:
The Federal Court of Appeal dismissed the advocacy group's request in August 2020, whereupon the advocacy group appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada.
The correct chronology of events is as follows:
A judge of the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed APR's request for a temporary (interlocutory) injunction. The judge declined to dismiss the case itself, which seeks a permanent injunction. [1] [2]
APR asked Supreme Court of Canada to hear an appeal from dismissal of the temporary (interlocutory) injunction. (The link in the article to this leave to appeal application is correct, but the editor misunderstood what it was referring it.) This leave to appeal is not about the permanent injunction.
Federal Court of Appeal judge clears path for hearing of APR's case, holding that the issue of reasonable apprehension of bias of the Canadian Transportation Agency merits a full hearing. [3] [4]
Gabor Lukacs (
talk)
16:09, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
References
The Federal Court of Appeal dismissed the advocacy group's request in August 2020, whereupon the advocacy group appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada. [1]
The correct statement is:
In May 2020, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed the advocacy group's request for a temporary (interlocutory) injunction, but declined to dismiss the case itself that sought a permanent injunction. [2] [3] In August 2020, the advocacy group asked the Supreme Court of Canada to hear an appeal with respect the the denial of the temporary injunction. [4] In October 2020, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal cleared the path for hearing of advocacy group's case, holding that the issue of reasonable apprehension of bias of the Canadian Transportation Agency merits a full hearing. [5] [6]
Gabor Lukacs ( talk) 00:10, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
References
[39] Because it says that APR’s application for judicial review does not relate to a matter that is amenable to judicial review, the CTA argues in its memorandum of fact and law that the application should be dismissed. There is, however, no motion currently before this Court seeking such relief, and any such motion would, in any event, have to be decided by a panel of judges, rather than a single judge. Consequently, I decline to make the order sought.
References
to dismiss the case is not only inaccurate, but may also be libelous.Editors are not allowed to make legal threats on Wikipedia. While I do not think your intention is to issue a legal threat, I think talking about Wikipedia being sued over this content is entering a murky grey-zone that we want to avoid.
The Air Passenger Rights organization has sought leave to appeal a Federal Court of Appeal decision that dismissed the group's attempt to compel the Canadian Transportation Agency to promptly remove a statement on refunds from its website.I interpreted this quote as saying that, in Aug 2020, the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed APR's motion to force CTA to remove the statement about refunds from their website. Upon closer examination of the source, I can see that I was wrong when I included that the ruling came out in August because the source does not verify that information. Thus I have removed the Aug 2020 date.
References