![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Thank you for the consolidation, but please, make sure any bolded terms in the lead actually exists as redirects. Thank you CapnZapp ( talk) 09:12, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello Lightiggy. You added some interesting stuff, but I have one question. Now the article claims Pitre weren't charged with murder and even protected against lynching. But later the article simply continues as before with "Marguerite Pitre was arrested on 14 June 1950, and tried separately, beginning 6 March 1951." To me, there's a disconnect there. What happened? The authorities appear to have done an about face, but the article never explains it. Can you shed any additional light on this? Perhaps the sources discuss both Ruest and Pitre while our language appears to discuss progress in their cases separately? CapnZapp ( talk) 08:01, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
I’m in progress, sorry. I’m getting to it. Guay was angry about Pitre being a snitch and told the authorities the truth. Lightiggy ( talk) 15:40, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
At the hospital, she told police that Guay had handed her the parcel, saying it was a bomb, and then encouraged her to commit suicide by saying she would be blamed? But why was Pitre and not Guay arrested in the first place, or why else did she attempt suicide? Would Guay have walked had Pitre not "snitched"?
In it, Guay claimed Ruest and Pitre had knowingly aided him in the bombing. As a result, Ruest was arrested on 6 June 1950. But wasn't Pitre's arrest (on the 14th) also a result of Guay's document?
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Thank you for the consolidation, but please, make sure any bolded terms in the lead actually exists as redirects. Thank you CapnZapp ( talk) 09:12, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello Lightiggy. You added some interesting stuff, but I have one question. Now the article claims Pitre weren't charged with murder and even protected against lynching. But later the article simply continues as before with "Marguerite Pitre was arrested on 14 June 1950, and tried separately, beginning 6 March 1951." To me, there's a disconnect there. What happened? The authorities appear to have done an about face, but the article never explains it. Can you shed any additional light on this? Perhaps the sources discuss both Ruest and Pitre while our language appears to discuss progress in their cases separately? CapnZapp ( talk) 08:01, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
I’m in progress, sorry. I’m getting to it. Guay was angry about Pitre being a snitch and told the authorities the truth. Lightiggy ( talk) 15:40, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
At the hospital, she told police that Guay had handed her the parcel, saying it was a bomb, and then encouraged her to commit suicide by saying she would be blamed? But why was Pitre and not Guay arrested in the first place, or why else did she attempt suicide? Would Guay have walked had Pitre not "snitched"?
In it, Guay claimed Ruest and Pitre had knowingly aided him in the bombing. As a result, Ruest was arrested on 6 June 1950. But wasn't Pitre's arrest (on the 14th) also a result of Guay's document?