This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Thank you to whoever created this page!
This article does not have the correct aircraft description. Somebody please add this!!! Nate 21:26, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
"The only" in the first paragraph??? What about Beriev Be-200 that is first of all firefighting plane? ( Poligraf P. Sharikov ( talk) 05:55, 5 April 2009 (UTC))
The Beriev is not a dedicated firefighter (they offer a firefighting variant). It's also a much newer plane than the 415. However "the only" is still wrong because the 415 is based on the CL-215, which was designed as a dedicated waterbomber in 1969. 99.230.231.234 ( talk) 04:56, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
The map of "World operators" shows Syria and Iran as operators, yet these countries are not mentioned in the text. Who can clear this contradiction? Jan olieslagers ( talk) 08:09, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
Payload of 6400lbs and retardant capacity of 13,000+lbs seem rather different. ?? 2001:56A:F414:D300:6D38:393A:750A:E7BD ( talk) 22:50, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The figures under the "General Characteristics" don't make much sense. It would suggest that carrying a full water load would mean not carrying much fuel? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.211.83.94 ( talk) 18:47, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
not the.way to do it > I only renamed in the article. I tried to move it also, but since CL-415 is a redirect, I asked an admin. -- Marc Lacoste ( talk) 05:57, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Spanish crashes Incidents http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RhjFvra4K4g — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.38.205.34 ( talk) 11:31, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
On March 13, 2020 Marc Lacoste placed a {{ mergeto}} on Viking Air CL-515. However, they skipped the important step of complying with WP:Merging#Step 1: Create a discussion, and creating a section explaining why they thought a merge was in order, here on Talk:Canadair CL-415. The only explanation I see was the laconic claim "same aircraft" in their edit summary.
Yeah, that claim is highly questionable:
On June 8th, Marc Lacoste redirected CL-515. But they made zero effort to actually merge the two articles. This is a serious mis-use of a {{ mergeto}} tag. Geo Swan ( talk) 01:44, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Thank you to whoever created this page!
This article does not have the correct aircraft description. Somebody please add this!!! Nate 21:26, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
"The only" in the first paragraph??? What about Beriev Be-200 that is first of all firefighting plane? ( Poligraf P. Sharikov ( talk) 05:55, 5 April 2009 (UTC))
The Beriev is not a dedicated firefighter (they offer a firefighting variant). It's also a much newer plane than the 415. However "the only" is still wrong because the 415 is based on the CL-215, which was designed as a dedicated waterbomber in 1969. 99.230.231.234 ( talk) 04:56, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
The map of "World operators" shows Syria and Iran as operators, yet these countries are not mentioned in the text. Who can clear this contradiction? Jan olieslagers ( talk) 08:09, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
Payload of 6400lbs and retardant capacity of 13,000+lbs seem rather different. ?? 2001:56A:F414:D300:6D38:393A:750A:E7BD ( talk) 22:50, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The figures under the "General Characteristics" don't make much sense. It would suggest that carrying a full water load would mean not carrying much fuel? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.211.83.94 ( talk) 18:47, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
not the.way to do it > I only renamed in the article. I tried to move it also, but since CL-415 is a redirect, I asked an admin. -- Marc Lacoste ( talk) 05:57, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Spanish crashes Incidents http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RhjFvra4K4g — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.38.205.34 ( talk) 11:31, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
On March 13, 2020 Marc Lacoste placed a {{ mergeto}} on Viking Air CL-515. However, they skipped the important step of complying with WP:Merging#Step 1: Create a discussion, and creating a section explaining why they thought a merge was in order, here on Talk:Canadair CL-415. The only explanation I see was the laconic claim "same aircraft" in their edit summary.
Yeah, that claim is highly questionable:
On June 8th, Marc Lacoste redirected CL-515. But they made zero effort to actually merge the two articles. This is a serious mis-use of a {{ mergeto}} tag. Geo Swan ( talk) 01:44, 20 July 2020 (UTC)