![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
No discussion presented on why the article was originally flagged - removing flag. -- 203.160.122.80 11:08, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
I'm new to this so I don't understand why this page was flagged with this. -- Jabbrwokk 21:53, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
The map highlghts the regional district, and doesn't show the location of Campbell River. I'll say again, as I have elsewhere in BC pages, that I think location maps based on RDs stink for anything other than RDs; the boundaries are artificial, nobody relates to them (in the same way they do, for instance, relate to the highways gride or the landforms). But this one's GOT to be changed. Skookum1 ( talk) 15:39, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
No discussion presented on why the article was originally flagged - removing flag. -- 203.160.122.80 11:08, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
I'm new to this so I don't understand why this page was flagged with this. -- Jabbrwokk 21:53, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
The map highlghts the regional district, and doesn't show the location of Campbell River. I'll say again, as I have elsewhere in BC pages, that I think location maps based on RDs stink for anything other than RDs; the boundaries are artificial, nobody relates to them (in the same way they do, for instance, relate to the highways gride or the landforms). But this one's GOT to be changed. Skookum1 ( talk) 15:39, 31 May 2008 (UTC)