![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that a photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Montana may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
![]() | A fact from Camp Paxson Boy Scout Camp appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 3 June 2012 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
One of the requirements in citation is that you have to have read the source that you are citing, so can I suggest that this ref:
might actually be a cite web, if you only read the online source, not the original Missoulian newspaper article from 1965? If that is so, then perhaps something like:
might be a better citation (assuming I've followed the links correctly). -- RexxS ( talk) 18:27, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
From the article and links, this appears to be a former Scout camp, thus the Scout camp category is no longer appropriate. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 11:20, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that a photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Montana may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
![]() | A fact from Camp Paxson Boy Scout Camp appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 3 June 2012 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
One of the requirements in citation is that you have to have read the source that you are citing, so can I suggest that this ref:
might actually be a cite web, if you only read the online source, not the original Missoulian newspaper article from 1965? If that is so, then perhaps something like:
might be a better citation (assuming I've followed the links correctly). -- RexxS ( talk) 18:27, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
From the article and links, this appears to be a former Scout camp, thus the Scout camp category is no longer appropriate. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 11:20, 11 June 2012 (UTC)