![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
Hi everyone, my name is Hannah and I work at Cambridge University Press. I would like to propose some changes and improvements to the Cambridge University Press Wikipedia page to bring it up to date, but I would very much like to engage the Wikipedia community on these changes before I publish them. You can find the proposed changes in my sandbox, /info/en/?search=User:Cmdcam01/sandbox. I would like to publish the changes in mid-August so any and all comments very much welcomed. Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cmdcam01 ( talk • contribs) 15:06, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Many thanks, The Rambling Man, really appreciate it; I hope you're well. Cmdcam01 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cmdcam01 ( talk • contribs) 16:00, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Can we please finally settle what has now descended into a frankly ridiculous edit war.
Cambridge University Press is no more. It has now amalgamated with Cambridge Assessment (one of the largest assessment bodies in the world) to create a new and distinct organisation - Cambridge University Press & Assessment.
Here are news articles reporting the merger:
https://www.cam.ac.uk/news/cambridge-university-press-to-join-with-cambridge-assessment
Here is the new website of the organisation. Note that it is quite clearly named "Cambridge University Press & Assessment".
https://www.cambridge.org — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabius Planciades Fulgentius ( talk • contribs) 17:06, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
I strongly agree with Joe Roe that the name Cambridge University Press is preferable. WP:COMMONNAME is the applicable policy, and Cambridge University Press is clearly the common name. It's also disruptive to move a page with over 20,000 incoming links without extraordinarily good reason. AleatoryPonderings ( ???) ( !!!) 21:56, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
Hi everyone, my name is Hannah and I work at Cambridge University Press. I would like to propose some changes and improvements to the Cambridge University Press Wikipedia page to bring it up to date, but I would very much like to engage the Wikipedia community on these changes before I publish them. You can find the proposed changes in my sandbox, /info/en/?search=User:Cmdcam01/sandbox. I would like to publish the changes in mid-August so any and all comments very much welcomed. Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cmdcam01 ( talk • contribs) 15:06, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Many thanks, The Rambling Man, really appreciate it; I hope you're well. Cmdcam01 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cmdcam01 ( talk • contribs) 16:00, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Can we please finally settle what has now descended into a frankly ridiculous edit war.
Cambridge University Press is no more. It has now amalgamated with Cambridge Assessment (one of the largest assessment bodies in the world) to create a new and distinct organisation - Cambridge University Press & Assessment.
Here are news articles reporting the merger:
https://www.cam.ac.uk/news/cambridge-university-press-to-join-with-cambridge-assessment
Here is the new website of the organisation. Note that it is quite clearly named "Cambridge University Press & Assessment".
https://www.cambridge.org — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabius Planciades Fulgentius ( talk • contribs) 17:06, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
I strongly agree with Joe Roe that the name Cambridge University Press is preferable. WP:COMMONNAME is the applicable policy, and Cambridge University Press is clearly the common name. It's also disruptive to move a page with over 20,000 incoming links without extraordinarily good reason. AleatoryPonderings ( ???) ( !!!) 21:56, 18 October 2021 (UTC)