This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: Keep, 28 March 2020, see discussion. Delete, 3 December 2017, see discussion.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Books This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles Academic Journals This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article. Companies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{ portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{ WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments North East England Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject North East England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North East EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject North East EnglandTemplate:WikiProject North East EnglandNorth East England articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Note that what was nominated for deletion in 2017 was a misleading redirect to University of Cambridge. Pam D 11:08, 26 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Two different editors of this article have raised discussion on my talk page. I've had enough of this article and don't intend to involve myself any more. I have suggested that this talk page is the appropriate venue for any further discussion. Pam D 17:50, 17 April 2020 (UTC) reply

... or, if things cannot be resolved here, that Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard might be appropriate. Pam D 14:36, 18 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Does being a contributor to a book published by CSP count as a WP:COI, I wonder? I note that the editor who has recently done a major edit verging onto peacockery is a contributor to [1] a recent book published by them. Pam D 10:35, 31 December 2020 (UTC) reply

If you hadn't started cleaning it up, I'd be inclined to just undo. In addition to the promotional language, there are no independent reliable sources added (it's all the official website and Quora). — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:22, 31 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Some books from Cambridge Scholars Publishing are basically just recycled from Wikipedia. See this noticeboard discussion for details. XOR'easter ( talk) 23:19, 30 November 2021 (UTC) reply

The following phrase is found in the article: “Although it was not included on the original Beall's List of predatory publishers, it was included on an updated list[when?].” I could not find an updated list at all, therefore this sentence is misleading and should be corrected, which I have done in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.16.217.20 ( talk) 14:52, 24 July 2023 (UTC) reply

In 2021, Cambridge Scholars Publishing was included in the updated Beall's list (open https://beallslist.net/ and scroll down to see the publishers added in 2021.) Palisandria ( talk) 05:06, 19 September 2023 (UTC) reply

This source is spurious. This is not Beall's list. It was published anonymously without giving any justification for the update. This is tantamount to defamation and should be immediately removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.103.192.38 ( talk) 13:45, 1 October 2023 (UTC) reply