This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Medicine: Neurology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Neurology task force. Neuroscience Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Caloric reflex test. PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles) The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine. Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Techniques section is very confusing, they use the term "turn" of the eyes which isn't clear, since eyes cannot rotate on a vertical axis. They can however move about in a circular pattern ALONG the vertical as if revolving along a center point of origin. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.44.5.172 ( talk) 06:36, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply

I thought that the clarity was fine (better than my professor explained it), however you are correct that it is not an accurate description of what is actually happening. I think that simply adding a link to eye anatomy page would suffice.-- Bastilleday uky ( talk) 09:32, 19 November 2009 (UTC) reply