![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Does the ACTA maintain any of Alameda Street, or is all locally maintained? It doesn't seem to have been taken over by Caltrans, despite signage and pages 6 and 10 of [1]. -- NE2 23:09, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Note "Proposed freeway". -- NE2 17:59, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Only a small portion of Alameda Street is signed as SR 47. I don't think a redirect is appropriate. 71.109.121.132 ( talk) 05:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm passing the article now, but please note that each term needs to be linked only the first time it appears in an article. Thus, LA (for example) doesn't need to be linked over and over again. Please fix this as soon as you can for the article overall. If this isn't changed, I may delist the article. However, it's pretty minor and the article is quite good otherwise.
I just took a quick look and although it appears that LA is linked over and over, those are actually linking to different articles, for example: Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, Downtown Los Angeles, Los Angeles Harbor, ect... -- Holderca1 talk 22:01, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
In the history section -- The Heim Bridge did not replace the Henry Ford Bridge -- the Henry Ford Bridge was always a rail bridge and to this day runs next to the Heim Bridge. The Ford Bridge was built in 1924 and replaced in 1996 and is still there (this info can be found on Wikipedia, by the way). Banjochris ( talk) 21:12, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
At present, Alameda Street redirects to this article. This article contains some content about Alameda Street when it doesn't carry SR 47. I propose that the content about Alameda Street be split into its own article, noting that many other arterial but not-CA highway streets in Los Angeles have their own articles. I believe Alameda Street to be independently notable of SR 47. Alameda Street exists for 3.1 miles as SR-47, 18.3 miles otherwise; and is a major street for its entire length. That's a factor of 6:1 as not SR-47, so it shouldn't redirect here. p b p 00:45, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on California State Route 47. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://cricket.csuchico.edu/spcfotos/maps/topo_search.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:54, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Does the ACTA maintain any of Alameda Street, or is all locally maintained? It doesn't seem to have been taken over by Caltrans, despite signage and pages 6 and 10 of [1]. -- NE2 23:09, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Note "Proposed freeway". -- NE2 17:59, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Only a small portion of Alameda Street is signed as SR 47. I don't think a redirect is appropriate. 71.109.121.132 ( talk) 05:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm passing the article now, but please note that each term needs to be linked only the first time it appears in an article. Thus, LA (for example) doesn't need to be linked over and over again. Please fix this as soon as you can for the article overall. If this isn't changed, I may delist the article. However, it's pretty minor and the article is quite good otherwise.
I just took a quick look and although it appears that LA is linked over and over, those are actually linking to different articles, for example: Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, Downtown Los Angeles, Los Angeles Harbor, ect... -- Holderca1 talk 22:01, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
In the history section -- The Heim Bridge did not replace the Henry Ford Bridge -- the Henry Ford Bridge was always a rail bridge and to this day runs next to the Heim Bridge. The Ford Bridge was built in 1924 and replaced in 1996 and is still there (this info can be found on Wikipedia, by the way). Banjochris ( talk) 21:12, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
At present, Alameda Street redirects to this article. This article contains some content about Alameda Street when it doesn't carry SR 47. I propose that the content about Alameda Street be split into its own article, noting that many other arterial but not-CA highway streets in Los Angeles have their own articles. I believe Alameda Street to be independently notable of SR 47. Alameda Street exists for 3.1 miles as SR-47, 18.3 miles otherwise; and is a major street for its entire length. That's a factor of 6:1 as not SR-47, so it shouldn't redirect here. p b p 00:45, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on California State Route 47. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://cricket.csuchico.edu/spcfotos/maps/topo_search.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:54, 13 November 2016 (UTC)