![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||
|
This is a part of the California State Highways Wikipedia Project, and this page needs to be called California State Route 15! DO NOT change it!
Um... does this page still need to be a stub? Also does this page need to be merged with I-15?-- Rschen7754 23:38, May 25, 2005 (UTC)
Sould this page be merged into Interstate 15 since they are now the same?-- Rschen7754 ( talk - contribs - count) 01:12, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
The wording sounds wrong, it still is Route 15, just now a completed Interstate. It's just former in terms of using the California State Route shield. Remember, California state law makes no distinction between California, U.S., and Interstate Highways. -- Geopgeop 13:31, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
Has I-15 actually been extended? All the signs on [1] still show it as SR-15. -- SPUI ( talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 03:47, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
I disagree with the move, but if the consensus succeeds at the highways page I'll take it. -- Rschen7754 ( talk - contribs) 00:02, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
Right. Please don't fuck up this article again. -- SPUI ( talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 19:14, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
I see people are blindly reverting, re-introducing errors such as the incorrect length (there is a milepost equation) and a typo in "Interstate" in the external links. What is wrong with you people? -- SPUI ( talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 07:57, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
There is still no justification whatsoever for removing the infobox from this article. Claims of redundancy and "it's too big" don't make much sense when this is the only article where those contentions are being made. - Chadbryant 12:55, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
Just a quick note: This article has been listed on Vandalisms in Prgress. Reading the comments on this page, it defineteley looks like user SPUI is in the wrong here. A single user does not get to make a edcision like this in his own, whether he is right or not. SPUI, I think you are coorect, the info box is too big, but you are going about this all the wrong way. Reinstate it, and do this the democratic way, is there really any point in getting annoyed or annoying others over a bit of HTML? No. Smitz 16:32, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
In keeping with the recent edits to {{
Infobox Interstate}} and {{
Infobox U.S. Route}}. --
SPUI (
talk -
don't use sorted stub templates!)
18:39, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
What is the problem with the routebox? Maybe we need to cut down the one on CA-1 and 99. That's it. -- Rschen7754 ( talk - contribs) 03:00, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Didn't Long Beach Freeway renumber from California 7 to Interstate 710 in 1985? Because the Floodgap old archeive 1984 maps shows Long Beach Freeway was still signed as CA-7 at that time. My guess is the renumber process takes gradual step. I thought was like summer 1984 is when they start to replace shields because approval is in June 1, 1984, in March 1985 there might still be CA-7 signs existing. Beacuse the 1984 still cosider L.B. Freeway as CA-7 I think is 1985 is when whole route renumber to I-710. Freewayguy ( Any questions? - My updates) 02:42, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
What other history can one provide for this route? — master son T - C 03:15, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||
|
This is a part of the California State Highways Wikipedia Project, and this page needs to be called California State Route 15! DO NOT change it!
Um... does this page still need to be a stub? Also does this page need to be merged with I-15?-- Rschen7754 23:38, May 25, 2005 (UTC)
Sould this page be merged into Interstate 15 since they are now the same?-- Rschen7754 ( talk - contribs - count) 01:12, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
The wording sounds wrong, it still is Route 15, just now a completed Interstate. It's just former in terms of using the California State Route shield. Remember, California state law makes no distinction between California, U.S., and Interstate Highways. -- Geopgeop 13:31, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
Has I-15 actually been extended? All the signs on [1] still show it as SR-15. -- SPUI ( talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 03:47, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
I disagree with the move, but if the consensus succeeds at the highways page I'll take it. -- Rschen7754 ( talk - contribs) 00:02, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
Right. Please don't fuck up this article again. -- SPUI ( talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 19:14, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
I see people are blindly reverting, re-introducing errors such as the incorrect length (there is a milepost equation) and a typo in "Interstate" in the external links. What is wrong with you people? -- SPUI ( talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 07:57, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
There is still no justification whatsoever for removing the infobox from this article. Claims of redundancy and "it's too big" don't make much sense when this is the only article where those contentions are being made. - Chadbryant 12:55, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
Just a quick note: This article has been listed on Vandalisms in Prgress. Reading the comments on this page, it defineteley looks like user SPUI is in the wrong here. A single user does not get to make a edcision like this in his own, whether he is right or not. SPUI, I think you are coorect, the info box is too big, but you are going about this all the wrong way. Reinstate it, and do this the democratic way, is there really any point in getting annoyed or annoying others over a bit of HTML? No. Smitz 16:32, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
In keeping with the recent edits to {{
Infobox Interstate}} and {{
Infobox U.S. Route}}. --
SPUI (
talk -
don't use sorted stub templates!)
18:39, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
What is the problem with the routebox? Maybe we need to cut down the one on CA-1 and 99. That's it. -- Rschen7754 ( talk - contribs) 03:00, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Didn't Long Beach Freeway renumber from California 7 to Interstate 710 in 1985? Because the Floodgap old archeive 1984 maps shows Long Beach Freeway was still signed as CA-7 at that time. My guess is the renumber process takes gradual step. I thought was like summer 1984 is when they start to replace shields because approval is in June 1, 1984, in March 1985 there might still be CA-7 signs existing. Beacuse the 1984 still cosider L.B. Freeway as CA-7 I think is 1985 is when whole route renumber to I-710. Freewayguy ( Any questions? - My updates) 02:42, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
What other history can one provide for this route? — master son T - C 03:15, 17 January 2008 (UTC)