This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Plants Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Australia: South Australia / Biota Low‑importance Caladenia littoricola is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject South Australia (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian What's this? at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of South Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

He died in 2002, and the older edition says nothing about epithet... so no? ~ cygnis insignis 11:48, 5 November 2019 (UTC) reply

The reference is incomplete, as it is omitting the name of the second author. The new edition is revised by Alex George (according to this page). Wimpus ( talk) 11:59, 5 November 2019 (UTC) reply

I was looking at an old revision, got muddled. I see there is a new edition, more interesting than the article in its current state. Continuous opportunities for improvement all round :) ~ cygnis insignis 12:22, 5 November 2019 (UTC) reply