This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Can someone write Dreish into this article so that Dreish is no longer a stub? Kingturtle ( talk) 14:35, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
The map needs a scale and a legend if possible. The section on Area section lacks any numerical reference (linear or areal). Please make these edits. 143.232.210.46 ( talk) 23:18, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
The banner photo of the Cairngorms is, in my view, rather unrepresentative. Does anyone else feel this, and could a more recognisable landscape be inserted?
Cairngormranger ( talk) 12:06, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Someone might like to do something with the map in {{ Location map Scotland Aberdeenshire}} ?? FlagSteward ( talk) 19:31, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
An image used in this article, File:Ben Macdui.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 22:36, 4 September 2011 (UTC) |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cairngorms. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:25, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
A recent edit has changed this to the singular form although the sentence structures remain for multiple. The area can be considered as one plateau divided by several deep valleys (Larig Ghru etc) or as several separate plateaux. A quick Google search suggests the former. Is there any justification for retaining the multiple style? Finavon ( talk) 09:36, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
This statement currently within the Geology section - 'The highest present-day peaks represent eroded monadnock hills. During the ice ages, the ice caps that covered most of northern Scotland remained static, frozen to the ground for long periods and actually protected the rounded summits and valleys and deep, weathered granite of the mountains of the area.' - needs support from a reference both in respect of the monadnock element and of the static ice cap element. As regards the latter, it has been argued that a static ice cap in the eastern Cairngorms would have protected tors from being obliterated but to extend that immobility, as the phrasing suggests, across 'most of northern Scotland' is stretching credulity Geopersona ( talk) 04:45, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
The text currently asserts that the Cairngorms are 'the eroded stumps of once much higher mountains'. Is there evidence for this? A reference is given but, not having access to it, I can't comment. Their plateau character suggests otherwise. Certainly there has been prolonged denudation with suggestions of perhaps up to 1.5km of overburden removed since the Devonian (Glasser & Bennett: Quaternary of the Cairngorms field guide, QRA 1996, p3) but that doesn't necessarily mean the land surface was 1.5km higher - buoyed up pieces of earth's crust (and granite is a relatively light rock) respond like icebergs to having the top layers removed - the whole mass rises but the surface elevation may stay roughly constant. cheers Geopersona ( talk) 06:16, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
How big are the Cairngorms? The infobox says 292 sq.km (113 sq.mi) but that's just the converted size of "Cairngorms SSSI" (29226.7 ha), which judging by the SSI's map, seems to be only a small part of the whole plateau. One or two websites quote a Cairngorms size of 1,107 sq.km / 428 sq.miles, but where they get the figure from is unclear (ie. unidentified). Cairngorms National Park is much larger than the Cairngorms as it also includes most of the surrounding hills, and is 4,528 sq.km (1,748 sq.miles). It seems to me that the Cairngorms size is probably a quarter of the Park's size (ie. 1,107 sq.km) rather than just a tenth (ie. 292.sq.km), but I can't find a verifiable source for the 1,107 sq.km. Can someone check it out and, if neccessary, amend the Cairngorms article's stated "size"? Pete Hobbs ( talk) 17:00, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Can someone write Dreish into this article so that Dreish is no longer a stub? Kingturtle ( talk) 14:35, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
The map needs a scale and a legend if possible. The section on Area section lacks any numerical reference (linear or areal). Please make these edits. 143.232.210.46 ( talk) 23:18, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
The banner photo of the Cairngorms is, in my view, rather unrepresentative. Does anyone else feel this, and could a more recognisable landscape be inserted?
Cairngormranger ( talk) 12:06, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Someone might like to do something with the map in {{ Location map Scotland Aberdeenshire}} ?? FlagSteward ( talk) 19:31, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
An image used in this article, File:Ben Macdui.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 22:36, 4 September 2011 (UTC) |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cairngorms. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:25, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
A recent edit has changed this to the singular form although the sentence structures remain for multiple. The area can be considered as one plateau divided by several deep valleys (Larig Ghru etc) or as several separate plateaux. A quick Google search suggests the former. Is there any justification for retaining the multiple style? Finavon ( talk) 09:36, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
This statement currently within the Geology section - 'The highest present-day peaks represent eroded monadnock hills. During the ice ages, the ice caps that covered most of northern Scotland remained static, frozen to the ground for long periods and actually protected the rounded summits and valleys and deep, weathered granite of the mountains of the area.' - needs support from a reference both in respect of the monadnock element and of the static ice cap element. As regards the latter, it has been argued that a static ice cap in the eastern Cairngorms would have protected tors from being obliterated but to extend that immobility, as the phrasing suggests, across 'most of northern Scotland' is stretching credulity Geopersona ( talk) 04:45, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
The text currently asserts that the Cairngorms are 'the eroded stumps of once much higher mountains'. Is there evidence for this? A reference is given but, not having access to it, I can't comment. Their plateau character suggests otherwise. Certainly there has been prolonged denudation with suggestions of perhaps up to 1.5km of overburden removed since the Devonian (Glasser & Bennett: Quaternary of the Cairngorms field guide, QRA 1996, p3) but that doesn't necessarily mean the land surface was 1.5km higher - buoyed up pieces of earth's crust (and granite is a relatively light rock) respond like icebergs to having the top layers removed - the whole mass rises but the surface elevation may stay roughly constant. cheers Geopersona ( talk) 06:16, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
How big are the Cairngorms? The infobox says 292 sq.km (113 sq.mi) but that's just the converted size of "Cairngorms SSSI" (29226.7 ha), which judging by the SSI's map, seems to be only a small part of the whole plateau. One or two websites quote a Cairngorms size of 1,107 sq.km / 428 sq.miles, but where they get the figure from is unclear (ie. unidentified). Cairngorms National Park is much larger than the Cairngorms as it also includes most of the surrounding hills, and is 4,528 sq.km (1,748 sq.miles). It seems to me that the Cairngorms size is probably a quarter of the Park's size (ie. 1,107 sq.km) rather than just a tenth (ie. 292.sq.km), but I can't find a verifiable source for the 1,107 sq.km. Can someone check it out and, if neccessary, amend the Cairngorms article's stated "size"? Pete Hobbs ( talk) 17:00, 10 March 2023 (UTC)