This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article's relation to Canaan may derserve comment. Septentrionalis 22:06, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
References
I suggest that this article will be mrged with Kenan under the article-name Kenan with a redirection to Kenan from Cainan since it is the same person with different spellings of the name. KMA "HF" N 08:46, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
References
Dear Mr IP,
Here is your chance to clearly state why you object to my changes and which words I am supposedly dropping from which quote! There is only one quote in this article and the only thing I did was re-formatting a comment about this quote into a footnote.
Please state your case here or cease your edit-warring. Str1977 (talk) 15:21, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Str1977, your changes to the quote do not make sense. The words "from Cainan" were dropped from the quote of Smith rendering it unintelligible, and the explanatory footnote is a sentence fragment. So I do not see this as an improvement to the previous structure. 172.56.35.26 ( talk) 20:43, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
I did the best I could to explain so don't put it on me and you still don't see the problem in the footnote? At least restore the word "what" to the beginning so it makes a sentence. Thanks 172.56.35.26 ( talk) 01:56, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article's relation to Canaan may derserve comment. Septentrionalis 22:06, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
References
I suggest that this article will be mrged with Kenan under the article-name Kenan with a redirection to Kenan from Cainan since it is the same person with different spellings of the name. KMA "HF" N 08:46, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
References
Dear Mr IP,
Here is your chance to clearly state why you object to my changes and which words I am supposedly dropping from which quote! There is only one quote in this article and the only thing I did was re-formatting a comment about this quote into a footnote.
Please state your case here or cease your edit-warring. Str1977 (talk) 15:21, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Str1977, your changes to the quote do not make sense. The words "from Cainan" were dropped from the quote of Smith rendering it unintelligible, and the explanatory footnote is a sentence fragment. So I do not see this as an improvement to the previous structure. 172.56.35.26 ( talk) 20:43, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
I did the best I could to explain so don't put it on me and you still don't see the problem in the footnote? At least restore the word "what" to the beginning so it makes a sentence. Thanks 172.56.35.26 ( talk) 01:56, 4 April 2015 (UTC)