From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Information is divided between the two in an irrational manner. Medieval and modern Cerveteri would be separate from Etruscan/Roman Caere, save that the UNESCO site is always Cerveteri.

Solution: Caere should be a redirect to Cerveteri, with all information represented at Cerveteri.

Would there be any objection? -- Wetman 20:25, 28 July 2007 (UTC) reply

Historical Section

This section is a bit confusing. Events are not presented in a strict chronological order and the logic is faulty. For example, if Caere had such good relations with Rome, why did they provide a refuge for the exiled kings and then go to war with them later? Some attempt at explanation is necessary. - Eponymous-Archon ( talk) 20:58, 13 April 2015 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Information is divided between the two in an irrational manner. Medieval and modern Cerveteri would be separate from Etruscan/Roman Caere, save that the UNESCO site is always Cerveteri.

Solution: Caere should be a redirect to Cerveteri, with all information represented at Cerveteri.

Would there be any objection? -- Wetman 20:25, 28 July 2007 (UTC) reply

Historical Section

This section is a bit confusing. Events are not presented in a strict chronological order and the logic is faulty. For example, if Caere had such good relations with Rome, why did they provide a refuge for the exiled kings and then go to war with them later? Some attempt at explanation is necessary. - Eponymous-Archon ( talk) 20:58, 13 April 2015 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook