![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is the white paper published yet? I can't find it in the Ekoparty website or on Juliano's twitter feed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.66.52.86 ( talk) 00:42, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
I added the paragraph about BREACH as an advancement of CRIME, as relevant. User:Thompor took issue with that and deleted the lot with the terse edit summary "improved", which was later reverted. What do others think about mentioning derivatives of CRIME? -- Lexein ( talk) 07:49, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
CRIME may also be defeated on the client side by placing restrictions on cross-site requests, known as cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection. The "CsFire" extension for Mozilla Firefox strips authentication and cookies from cross-site requests, while the "RequestPolicy" extension completely blocks cross-site requests by default. However, these extensions interfere with the normal operation of many websites, so the user must set up and maintain whitelists of unrestricted requests. [1]
All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough,
21:21, 15 June 2015 (UTC).
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:BREACH (security exploit) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 23:33, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is the white paper published yet? I can't find it in the Ekoparty website or on Juliano's twitter feed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.66.52.86 ( talk) 00:42, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
I added the paragraph about BREACH as an advancement of CRIME, as relevant. User:Thompor took issue with that and deleted the lot with the terse edit summary "improved", which was later reverted. What do others think about mentioning derivatives of CRIME? -- Lexein ( talk) 07:49, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
CRIME may also be defeated on the client side by placing restrictions on cross-site requests, known as cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection. The "CsFire" extension for Mozilla Firefox strips authentication and cookies from cross-site requests, while the "RequestPolicy" extension completely blocks cross-site requests by default. However, these extensions interfere with the normal operation of many websites, so the user must set up and maintain whitelists of unrestricted requests. [1]
All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough,
21:21, 15 June 2015 (UTC).
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:BREACH (security exploit) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 23:33, 4 March 2017 (UTC)