![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
![]() | This
edit request to
2020 coronavirus pandemic in the Philippines has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change "there are 98 confirmed cases in the Philippines" into "there are 111 confirmed cases in the Philippines". Renzjarredh ( talk) 13:27, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Where? — hueman1 ( talk • contributions) 13:30, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
2020 coronavirus pandemic in the Philippines has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add the HK guy who travelled to PH not listed yet on the page.
The second case involves a 31-year-old man (the 132nd case). The patient with underlying illness lives at Serene Court, Sai Ning Street, Kennedy Town. He developed fever, myalgia and diarrhea since March 8. He attended a clinic at an institution yesterday and then attended the Accident and Emergency Department at Queen Mary Hospital. His deep throat saliva specimen was tested positive for COVID-19 virus today and has been arranged for management at Tuen Mun Hospital. He is now in stable condition. The patient had travel history during the incubation period. He had been to Boston in the United States of America between February 22 and March 1. He then travelled from Boston to Manila in the Philippines via Tokyo in Japan arriving Manila on March 2. He returned to Hong Kong from Manila by flight CX930 by Cathay Pacific on March 8. His wife who lives with him is asymptomatic and will be arranged for quarantine. Demch1969 ( talk) 15:43, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
I just want to notify everyone that I created a draftspace for the coronavirus pandemic in Metro Manila. If anyone is interested on expanding it, please feel free to do so. Thanks! — hueman1 ( talk • contributions) 15:46, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Can we use this to update the table? - SUB WAY 14:04, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Wondering where it is. Ominae ( talk) 10:20, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
I've created WikiProject COVID-19 as a temporary or permanent WikiProject and invite editors to use this space for discussing ways to improve coverage of the ongoing 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic. Please bring your ideas to the project/talk page. Stay safe, -- Another Believer ( Talk) 17:29, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Anyone got sources for that? Ominae ( talk) 15:50, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
He's not a resident of Cotabato City. He's a resident of Lanao del Sur, only to be confined in Cotabato Regional and Medical Center. The authentication is at the following pages: https://www.facebook.com/Atty.Cynthia https://www.facebook.com/BNFMCotabato/
Thank you. Marwan_Khan ( talk) 01:30, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- The References are messed up in arrangements, with some preceding over others (Like Ref Nos. 1-6 preceding No. 7), outdated ones (Like No.8 on front tally), and different articles of same topic are used on different sections (Like articles cited for Prof. Baviera) Ash CA ( talk) 12:25, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Did patient 135 recover already? It says "The patient recovered on March 17" but the status is still admitted. I also cannot see any news about her recovery. Must be a mistake? Can someone confirm? Thanks. - SUB WAY 23:30, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Please replace the "Suspected Cases" with "Persons Under Investigation", "Persons Under Monitoring" and "Tests Conducted" Since the latter is not updated and not that applicable to our country's tallying system You can add categories for the infobox here: /info/en/?search=Template:Infobox_epidemic — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ash CA ( talk • contribs) 06:54, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
https://www.facebook.com/carlo.l.navarro/posts/10223263502644867?_rdc=1&_rdr 152.32.102.226 ( talk) 06:46, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
I find this table really irrelevant. The increments can already be found in the Statistics part of the article. Also, the notes don't really help much: "Only two new cases", "Only three new cases"???? This is really redundant and I suggest be removed.- SUB WAY 03:46, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
This is in response to issues circulating this time of epidemic Aesyeo ( talk) 15:59, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Since they do not qualify with WP:NOTE, they were removed. But I believe that they must be included, as they are frontliners or personalities who made regional or national relevance. Please do not remove. List of frontliners will also be updated once all names are gathered. Ash CA ( talk) 02:17, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Details for frontliners are now complete. Will edit it with permission.
These are recognized people, even they do not qualify in WP:NOTE. These cases are "unique" and can be compared to the first cases of this Pandemic in the country, which also garnered significant focus in this article. Ash CA ( talk) 03:55, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
When should we have a consensus? More information are coming in Aesyeo ( talk) 15:58, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
New cases in the following provinces:
1) Isabela 2) Nueva Vizcaya 3) Oriental Mindoro
Also, Leyte doesn't have a local case yet. The current positive COVID-19 case in the province is a resident of Catarman, Northern Samar.
The province of Abra also has 1 local case currently admitted in La Union. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaspac ( talk • contribs) 05:38, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
2020 coronavirus pandemic in the Philippines has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change PH 25's facility of admission from Chinese General Hospital and Medical Center to Santa Ana Hospital. Thanks! Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Un26sSOE7qQ 3:40 and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEoag_6NRaY 4:54 152.32.101.52 ( talk) 15:02, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
The data for LGUs on "Lockdown" section is already outdated It is on March 25, and several places already issued lockdown, like Cebu etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aesyeo ( talk • contribs) 08:18, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Should we list provinces with officially confirmed cases (not necessarily from the Department of Health; like their local governments or DOH regional offices) liek the "Affected Regions" section of the 2009 flu pandemic in the Philippines? Also some provinces make announcements even though their cases were admitted in another LGU and this should be noted accordingly. I would assume they would weigh in several factors before declaring a case their LGU's first case. This would give a more accurate picture of the disease's spread in the Philippines rather than just relying on cases according to residence or hospital of admission of the patient. Hariboneagle927 ( talk) 04:14, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Up until PH 803, we have the data for Hospital of Admission that both the UP and DOH Dashboard doesn't have
Where are we getting this data, and does that source already became unreliable? Aesyeo ( talk) 09:43, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
I just noticed that the table of Identified Cases was gone, and therefore not updated since yesterday (Remains at 1546 cases) and barely edited since then. I think those information are crucial. Thank You for responses! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aesyeo ( talk • contribs) 10:28, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Can we please add data to indicate the hospital bed capacity exclusive for CoViD19 cases in the Philippines? This is also critical in the planning and responsiveness rate of our inter-agencies during this pandemic. This can also be used in forecasting support needed by the health sector as compared to the increasing needs per our confirmed cases rate.-- leksespayos ( talk) 12:10, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
But I think they only made it worse. https://ncovtracker.doh.gov.ph/ is now telling you to go to https://www.doh.gov.ph/covid19tracker! The map is gone @ Hariboneagle927:. The cases are gone too @ Renzoy16:. But they have data for bed capacities now, isn't that great? I don't know how am I supposed to feel right now, most of the data can be easily interpreted with a spreadsheet application. I'm sorry for the slight drama, this is kinda disappointing for that period of time. I mean I was expecting for a change or something good, but this is what we have right now. I hope that I'm wrong and they'll be adding more data soon! — hueman1 ( talk • contributions) 15:35, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello, as developments flood in, the article continues to expand at an exponential rate. I'll leave suggestions on what actions could be made to improve this article and other COVID-19 Philippine related articles.
There's lots of room for improvement. But I'll leave these for now. Hariboneagle927 ( talk) 09:16, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
"As of April 22, the 26 out of 81 provinces of the Philippines has confirmed at least a case.[15]" - meaning 26 provinces out of 81 provinces have COVID-19 cases? Seems erroneous. JWilz12345 ( Talk| Contrib's.) 03:29, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Discussion ongoing...
I'm inviting everyone to participate on my move request at
Talk:2020 Philippine community quarantines. Thank you! —
hueman1 (
talk •
contributions)
07:11, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
In the statistic section, the death percentage should be the death rate defined as #OfDeath/#OfInfected. At present, the death percentage is of composition, that's not really informative. Can we change to death rate? any support or objection? Jackzhp ( talk) 16:21, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
In the "By Gender and Age" section, the Lethality chart at the right side of the table is wrong. Except for the "total" is right, the rest is not lethality percentage, but composition percentage. For example, for the "above 90" group, it is 30% which is higher than 15% which is for the "60-69" group. Jackzhp ( talk) 05:00, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Based on the dates indicated, those were last updated on late March, which is already outdated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aesyeo ( talk • contribs) 11:37, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
I think it is necessary, but it is still up to other authors to approve this or not.
Philippines really has a high infection rate for Healthcare Workers ( https://www.cnn.ph/news/2020/5/4/covid-infected-health-workers-PH.html) which is 18.68% compared to 2-3% average to the Western Pacific Region. The death toll also stands at 34. I believe that the reasons behind this and the actions about this should be presented, as well as the names of the 34 heroes who passed away with this disease.
Although the final decision still lies on the other authors, and I would respect that. HIHIHI^U^ Aesyeo ( talk) 11:46, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
I think we should revise the "Impact" Section of this article to pattern it more closely to the same Wiki Article for USA by dividing it to Social and Economic Impact. For example, Financial Market, Employment, Food Supply, Medicine Supply, and Retail would be for Economic Impact Entertainment and Media, Prisons, Sports, Tourism, Religious Services, and Education would fit on Social Impact
I think it would be more organized that way, and updating details would be easier. Aesyeo ( talk) 10:45, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Why was Response placed before Economic and Social Impact? " Isn't it that by logic, Impact was the one addressed by Response — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aesyeo ( talk • contribs) 09:23, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
I just wonder why the mañanita incident is not mentioned in any of the COVID-19 articles related to the Philippines? It has already gained so much media coverage because it was a clear violation of the ECQ guidelines. Also, the involvement of Debold Sinas, the head of the NCRPO, should be notable enough for this incident to appear in the articles. LSGH ( talk) ( contributions) 09:27, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
I think the health department's backlog on validating the test results should be mentioned in the cases section too, not just the posthumous results. — hueman1 ( talk • contributions) 03:17, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
I don't know how to make an edit to this page to bring it up to what is really going on - so I thought I would mention it here and more advanced editors might want to jump in.
There is more of a stay-at-home lockdown than what is reported in the chart and on this page.
In the island of Luzon for example, the area of Pampanga specifically, no one under 21 or over 60 is currently allowed out of their homes; anyone else out must EITHER have valid employment to go to or a "quarantine pass", which is checked as you enter various establishments like malls -- and access is prevented without it. [a 1] In Angeles City, all inbound access roads have checkpoints preventing anyone from entering that doesn't have a legitimate reason.
From what friends tell me, it is like that in many other areas of the country, including the Subic Economic Zone. According to today's new, Negros is considering an all encompassing stay-at-home because of rising numbers. [a 2]
Philippines casinos outside Manila were allowed to open, but recently shut down when employees tested positive [a 3]
Thanks for anyone's help with this. Sarab73 ( talk) 20:34, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Are there any info missing here? I mean generalized information that should be here. What are the milestone events? I understand that there was an urge to include everything in the first months on the pandemic. Now I'm working on the article so it gives an overview on the effects on the pandemic in the Philippines. I feel that the following should be reworked. By region - this should be reworked to give an overview of cases in the region. Re-tweaked for overall cohesiveness so that the sentences don't seem to "repeat" itself. The social and economic impact should be expanded a bit to include the major points (but not include everything in the main articles). Hariboneagle927 ( talk) 15:09, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
@ Hariboneagle927: I still think that it'd be better to move them (impacts) back here. I'd prefer to see all them in one place instead of hopping into different articles. — hueman1 ( talk • contributions) 10:26, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
@ Hariboneagle927: Can we use this as the basis for the timeline section? — hueman1 ( talk • contributions) 15:01, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Aren't we going to mention the ongoing issue with the PhilHealth? — hueman1 ( talk • contributions) 10:39, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
The correct tally cases: 1-9 10-99 100-999 1000-9999 10000-99999 100000+ Aldrin0000 ( talk) 04:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
![]() | This
edit request to
2020 coronavirus pandemic in the Philippines has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change "there are 98 confirmed cases in the Philippines" into "there are 111 confirmed cases in the Philippines". Renzjarredh ( talk) 13:27, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Where? — hueman1 ( talk • contributions) 13:30, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
2020 coronavirus pandemic in the Philippines has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add the HK guy who travelled to PH not listed yet on the page.
The second case involves a 31-year-old man (the 132nd case). The patient with underlying illness lives at Serene Court, Sai Ning Street, Kennedy Town. He developed fever, myalgia and diarrhea since March 8. He attended a clinic at an institution yesterday and then attended the Accident and Emergency Department at Queen Mary Hospital. His deep throat saliva specimen was tested positive for COVID-19 virus today and has been arranged for management at Tuen Mun Hospital. He is now in stable condition. The patient had travel history during the incubation period. He had been to Boston in the United States of America between February 22 and March 1. He then travelled from Boston to Manila in the Philippines via Tokyo in Japan arriving Manila on March 2. He returned to Hong Kong from Manila by flight CX930 by Cathay Pacific on March 8. His wife who lives with him is asymptomatic and will be arranged for quarantine. Demch1969 ( talk) 15:43, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
I just want to notify everyone that I created a draftspace for the coronavirus pandemic in Metro Manila. If anyone is interested on expanding it, please feel free to do so. Thanks! — hueman1 ( talk • contributions) 15:46, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Can we use this to update the table? - SUB WAY 14:04, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Wondering where it is. Ominae ( talk) 10:20, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
I've created WikiProject COVID-19 as a temporary or permanent WikiProject and invite editors to use this space for discussing ways to improve coverage of the ongoing 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic. Please bring your ideas to the project/talk page. Stay safe, -- Another Believer ( Talk) 17:29, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Anyone got sources for that? Ominae ( talk) 15:50, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
He's not a resident of Cotabato City. He's a resident of Lanao del Sur, only to be confined in Cotabato Regional and Medical Center. The authentication is at the following pages: https://www.facebook.com/Atty.Cynthia https://www.facebook.com/BNFMCotabato/
Thank you. Marwan_Khan ( talk) 01:30, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- The References are messed up in arrangements, with some preceding over others (Like Ref Nos. 1-6 preceding No. 7), outdated ones (Like No.8 on front tally), and different articles of same topic are used on different sections (Like articles cited for Prof. Baviera) Ash CA ( talk) 12:25, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Did patient 135 recover already? It says "The patient recovered on March 17" but the status is still admitted. I also cannot see any news about her recovery. Must be a mistake? Can someone confirm? Thanks. - SUB WAY 23:30, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Please replace the "Suspected Cases" with "Persons Under Investigation", "Persons Under Monitoring" and "Tests Conducted" Since the latter is not updated and not that applicable to our country's tallying system You can add categories for the infobox here: /info/en/?search=Template:Infobox_epidemic — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ash CA ( talk • contribs) 06:54, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
https://www.facebook.com/carlo.l.navarro/posts/10223263502644867?_rdc=1&_rdr 152.32.102.226 ( talk) 06:46, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
I find this table really irrelevant. The increments can already be found in the Statistics part of the article. Also, the notes don't really help much: "Only two new cases", "Only three new cases"???? This is really redundant and I suggest be removed.- SUB WAY 03:46, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
This is in response to issues circulating this time of epidemic Aesyeo ( talk) 15:59, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Since they do not qualify with WP:NOTE, they were removed. But I believe that they must be included, as they are frontliners or personalities who made regional or national relevance. Please do not remove. List of frontliners will also be updated once all names are gathered. Ash CA ( talk) 02:17, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Details for frontliners are now complete. Will edit it with permission.
These are recognized people, even they do not qualify in WP:NOTE. These cases are "unique" and can be compared to the first cases of this Pandemic in the country, which also garnered significant focus in this article. Ash CA ( talk) 03:55, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
When should we have a consensus? More information are coming in Aesyeo ( talk) 15:58, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
New cases in the following provinces:
1) Isabela 2) Nueva Vizcaya 3) Oriental Mindoro
Also, Leyte doesn't have a local case yet. The current positive COVID-19 case in the province is a resident of Catarman, Northern Samar.
The province of Abra also has 1 local case currently admitted in La Union. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaspac ( talk • contribs) 05:38, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
2020 coronavirus pandemic in the Philippines has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change PH 25's facility of admission from Chinese General Hospital and Medical Center to Santa Ana Hospital. Thanks! Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Un26sSOE7qQ 3:40 and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEoag_6NRaY 4:54 152.32.101.52 ( talk) 15:02, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
The data for LGUs on "Lockdown" section is already outdated It is on March 25, and several places already issued lockdown, like Cebu etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aesyeo ( talk • contribs) 08:18, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Should we list provinces with officially confirmed cases (not necessarily from the Department of Health; like their local governments or DOH regional offices) liek the "Affected Regions" section of the 2009 flu pandemic in the Philippines? Also some provinces make announcements even though their cases were admitted in another LGU and this should be noted accordingly. I would assume they would weigh in several factors before declaring a case their LGU's first case. This would give a more accurate picture of the disease's spread in the Philippines rather than just relying on cases according to residence or hospital of admission of the patient. Hariboneagle927 ( talk) 04:14, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Up until PH 803, we have the data for Hospital of Admission that both the UP and DOH Dashboard doesn't have
Where are we getting this data, and does that source already became unreliable? Aesyeo ( talk) 09:43, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
I just noticed that the table of Identified Cases was gone, and therefore not updated since yesterday (Remains at 1546 cases) and barely edited since then. I think those information are crucial. Thank You for responses! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aesyeo ( talk • contribs) 10:28, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Can we please add data to indicate the hospital bed capacity exclusive for CoViD19 cases in the Philippines? This is also critical in the planning and responsiveness rate of our inter-agencies during this pandemic. This can also be used in forecasting support needed by the health sector as compared to the increasing needs per our confirmed cases rate.-- leksespayos ( talk) 12:10, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
But I think they only made it worse. https://ncovtracker.doh.gov.ph/ is now telling you to go to https://www.doh.gov.ph/covid19tracker! The map is gone @ Hariboneagle927:. The cases are gone too @ Renzoy16:. But they have data for bed capacities now, isn't that great? I don't know how am I supposed to feel right now, most of the data can be easily interpreted with a spreadsheet application. I'm sorry for the slight drama, this is kinda disappointing for that period of time. I mean I was expecting for a change or something good, but this is what we have right now. I hope that I'm wrong and they'll be adding more data soon! — hueman1 ( talk • contributions) 15:35, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello, as developments flood in, the article continues to expand at an exponential rate. I'll leave suggestions on what actions could be made to improve this article and other COVID-19 Philippine related articles.
There's lots of room for improvement. But I'll leave these for now. Hariboneagle927 ( talk) 09:16, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
"As of April 22, the 26 out of 81 provinces of the Philippines has confirmed at least a case.[15]" - meaning 26 provinces out of 81 provinces have COVID-19 cases? Seems erroneous. JWilz12345 ( Talk| Contrib's.) 03:29, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Discussion ongoing...
I'm inviting everyone to participate on my move request at
Talk:2020 Philippine community quarantines. Thank you! —
hueman1 (
talk •
contributions)
07:11, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
In the statistic section, the death percentage should be the death rate defined as #OfDeath/#OfInfected. At present, the death percentage is of composition, that's not really informative. Can we change to death rate? any support or objection? Jackzhp ( talk) 16:21, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
In the "By Gender and Age" section, the Lethality chart at the right side of the table is wrong. Except for the "total" is right, the rest is not lethality percentage, but composition percentage. For example, for the "above 90" group, it is 30% which is higher than 15% which is for the "60-69" group. Jackzhp ( talk) 05:00, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Based on the dates indicated, those were last updated on late March, which is already outdated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aesyeo ( talk • contribs) 11:37, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
I think it is necessary, but it is still up to other authors to approve this or not.
Philippines really has a high infection rate for Healthcare Workers ( https://www.cnn.ph/news/2020/5/4/covid-infected-health-workers-PH.html) which is 18.68% compared to 2-3% average to the Western Pacific Region. The death toll also stands at 34. I believe that the reasons behind this and the actions about this should be presented, as well as the names of the 34 heroes who passed away with this disease.
Although the final decision still lies on the other authors, and I would respect that. HIHIHI^U^ Aesyeo ( talk) 11:46, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
I think we should revise the "Impact" Section of this article to pattern it more closely to the same Wiki Article for USA by dividing it to Social and Economic Impact. For example, Financial Market, Employment, Food Supply, Medicine Supply, and Retail would be for Economic Impact Entertainment and Media, Prisons, Sports, Tourism, Religious Services, and Education would fit on Social Impact
I think it would be more organized that way, and updating details would be easier. Aesyeo ( talk) 10:45, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Why was Response placed before Economic and Social Impact? " Isn't it that by logic, Impact was the one addressed by Response — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aesyeo ( talk • contribs) 09:23, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
I just wonder why the mañanita incident is not mentioned in any of the COVID-19 articles related to the Philippines? It has already gained so much media coverage because it was a clear violation of the ECQ guidelines. Also, the involvement of Debold Sinas, the head of the NCRPO, should be notable enough for this incident to appear in the articles. LSGH ( talk) ( contributions) 09:27, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
I think the health department's backlog on validating the test results should be mentioned in the cases section too, not just the posthumous results. — hueman1 ( talk • contributions) 03:17, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
I don't know how to make an edit to this page to bring it up to what is really going on - so I thought I would mention it here and more advanced editors might want to jump in.
There is more of a stay-at-home lockdown than what is reported in the chart and on this page.
In the island of Luzon for example, the area of Pampanga specifically, no one under 21 or over 60 is currently allowed out of their homes; anyone else out must EITHER have valid employment to go to or a "quarantine pass", which is checked as you enter various establishments like malls -- and access is prevented without it. [a 1] In Angeles City, all inbound access roads have checkpoints preventing anyone from entering that doesn't have a legitimate reason.
From what friends tell me, it is like that in many other areas of the country, including the Subic Economic Zone. According to today's new, Negros is considering an all encompassing stay-at-home because of rising numbers. [a 2]
Philippines casinos outside Manila were allowed to open, but recently shut down when employees tested positive [a 3]
Thanks for anyone's help with this. Sarab73 ( talk) 20:34, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Are there any info missing here? I mean generalized information that should be here. What are the milestone events? I understand that there was an urge to include everything in the first months on the pandemic. Now I'm working on the article so it gives an overview on the effects on the pandemic in the Philippines. I feel that the following should be reworked. By region - this should be reworked to give an overview of cases in the region. Re-tweaked for overall cohesiveness so that the sentences don't seem to "repeat" itself. The social and economic impact should be expanded a bit to include the major points (but not include everything in the main articles). Hariboneagle927 ( talk) 15:09, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
@ Hariboneagle927: I still think that it'd be better to move them (impacts) back here. I'd prefer to see all them in one place instead of hopping into different articles. — hueman1 ( talk • contributions) 10:26, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
@ Hariboneagle927: Can we use this as the basis for the timeline section? — hueman1 ( talk • contributions) 15:01, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Aren't we going to mention the ongoing issue with the PhilHealth? — hueman1 ( talk • contributions) 10:39, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
The correct tally cases: 1-9 10-99 100-999 1000-9999 10000-99999 100000+ Aldrin0000 ( talk) 04:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)