This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 28 days |
The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to
COVID-19, broadly construed, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Material from 2019–20 Wuhan coronavirus outbreak by country and territory was split to 2020 coronavirus outbreak in Thailand on 17 February 2020 at 16:43. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. The former page's talk page can be accessed at Talk:2019–20 Wuhan coronavirus outbreak by country and territory. |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
This article could do with some major restructuring. I'm not going to attempt that just yet, but here are some major points that should be mentioned or expanded. -- Paul_012 ( talk) 10:29, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Can someone fix the formatting for the cases bar chart? The cases for 22/03/2020 doesn't look nice — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bennypc ( talk • contribs) 06:24, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Tony Patt, right, so what's the big deal? What do you not agree at on that part of content removal in the page?
Flix11 don't make edit summary reasons for the revert so just forget this user. For now there is only two people that is truly interested in this edit that is you and me so the talk should remain in personal talk pages of either you or me. Unless a 3rd person jump in, or in case we two can't reach a consensus after some discussion, then we might put the stuff in the article's talk page.
I have stated explanation for this content removal in the summary box, please read them and make further arguements if you want to. IWeeBoo ( talk) 08:54, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
@ Tony Patt. Thank you, I will try to make my commenting points simple.
@ Tony Patt, good job, now that the page's structure is vastly changed, I just literally lose any interests in talking with you. I just saw you adding a new section that is not so necessary. Happy editing the page in anyway you wish!
On the first case area, the second paragaph begins with "Thailand's second confirmed case ...", so readers now already knew that the first story (in the above paragraph) is the first comfirmed case. The two paragraphs are linked. It's just a method to avoid repetitive writing.
I don't get how you find the word significant is "fact" reporting. It's an adjective of subjective evaluation/comment. I could very well evaluate that the damage is in fact mild but the patient lungs are just weak.
I don't think you understand all of my points. Please re-read them and consider undoing some of your own edits on conflicting areas we have been discussing. IWeeBoo ( talk) 02:33, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
I've split the timeline section off to Timeline of the COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand, since it carried a bit too much detail. Most problematic currently, however, are the templates, which are causing great difficulty in loading the pages. They will need to be dealt with somehow. -- Paul_012 ( talk) 13:23, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
I'm thinking that the statistics section should probably also be moved to the sub-article. Maybe rename it to Timeline and statistics of the COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand. -- Paul_012 ( talk) 13:29, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
I've moved the tables and renamed the target article accordingly. They could probably be split sometime, but there are citations in the timeline article that currently refer to references in the templates, so that will need to be sorted out first. -- Paul_012 ( talk) 12:55, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
The number of cases/deaths in the intro paragraph isn't the same as the one in the infobox. - 184.56.75.144 ( talk) 07:13, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
As of 8 July 2021 ...— Bagumba ( talk) 07:17, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 28 days |
The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to
COVID-19, broadly construed, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Material from 2019–20 Wuhan coronavirus outbreak by country and territory was split to 2020 coronavirus outbreak in Thailand on 17 February 2020 at 16:43. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. The former page's talk page can be accessed at Talk:2019–20 Wuhan coronavirus outbreak by country and territory. |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
This article could do with some major restructuring. I'm not going to attempt that just yet, but here are some major points that should be mentioned or expanded. -- Paul_012 ( talk) 10:29, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Can someone fix the formatting for the cases bar chart? The cases for 22/03/2020 doesn't look nice — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bennypc ( talk • contribs) 06:24, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Tony Patt, right, so what's the big deal? What do you not agree at on that part of content removal in the page?
Flix11 don't make edit summary reasons for the revert so just forget this user. For now there is only two people that is truly interested in this edit that is you and me so the talk should remain in personal talk pages of either you or me. Unless a 3rd person jump in, or in case we two can't reach a consensus after some discussion, then we might put the stuff in the article's talk page.
I have stated explanation for this content removal in the summary box, please read them and make further arguements if you want to. IWeeBoo ( talk) 08:54, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
@ Tony Patt. Thank you, I will try to make my commenting points simple.
@ Tony Patt, good job, now that the page's structure is vastly changed, I just literally lose any interests in talking with you. I just saw you adding a new section that is not so necessary. Happy editing the page in anyway you wish!
On the first case area, the second paragaph begins with "Thailand's second confirmed case ...", so readers now already knew that the first story (in the above paragraph) is the first comfirmed case. The two paragraphs are linked. It's just a method to avoid repetitive writing.
I don't get how you find the word significant is "fact" reporting. It's an adjective of subjective evaluation/comment. I could very well evaluate that the damage is in fact mild but the patient lungs are just weak.
I don't think you understand all of my points. Please re-read them and consider undoing some of your own edits on conflicting areas we have been discussing. IWeeBoo ( talk) 02:33, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
I've split the timeline section off to Timeline of the COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand, since it carried a bit too much detail. Most problematic currently, however, are the templates, which are causing great difficulty in loading the pages. They will need to be dealt with somehow. -- Paul_012 ( talk) 13:23, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
I'm thinking that the statistics section should probably also be moved to the sub-article. Maybe rename it to Timeline and statistics of the COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand. -- Paul_012 ( talk) 13:29, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
I've moved the tables and renamed the target article accordingly. They could probably be split sometime, but there are citations in the timeline article that currently refer to references in the templates, so that will need to be sorted out first. -- Paul_012 ( talk) 12:55, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
The number of cases/deaths in the intro paragraph isn't the same as the one in the infobox. - 184.56.75.144 ( talk) 07:13, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
As of 8 July 2021 ...— Bagumba ( talk) 07:17, 17 August 2021 (UTC)