This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
COVID-19 pandemic in Montreal article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to
COVID-19, broadly construed, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below. |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I do not believe that these Montreal history sections belong in this article, @ Steam5:, @ UnitedStatesian:, @ Zak lef::
Those who've created and worked on the page might want to edit. RFT42 ( talk) 19:32, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
I think this article is getting needlessly long with too much detailed information that often needs to be cleaned up for grammar. @ Zak lef: Could you try to add only the most pertinent information in the future? Nsophiay ( talk) 04:12, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi, you are right, I will summarize some parts better User:Zak lef
While the article is referenced properly, my issue is that a majority of the sources are in French. There are English sources, I'm sure, that speak of the same subject. Callmemirela 🍁 talk 20:20, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
The map hasn't been updated since May. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fornico ( talk • contribs) 17:26, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Should we move the boroughs section to its own article? It's quite long and I think it clutters up the page. Nsophiay ( talk) 14:27, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
I think the cases table could benefit from being smaller, size wise. It would probably be easier to read. CaffeinAddict ( talk) 01:33, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
COVID-19 pandemic in Montreal article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to
COVID-19, broadly construed, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below. |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I do not believe that these Montreal history sections belong in this article, @ Steam5:, @ UnitedStatesian:, @ Zak lef::
Those who've created and worked on the page might want to edit. RFT42 ( talk) 19:32, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
I think this article is getting needlessly long with too much detailed information that often needs to be cleaned up for grammar. @ Zak lef: Could you try to add only the most pertinent information in the future? Nsophiay ( talk) 04:12, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi, you are right, I will summarize some parts better User:Zak lef
While the article is referenced properly, my issue is that a majority of the sources are in French. There are English sources, I'm sure, that speak of the same subject. Callmemirela 🍁 talk 20:20, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
The map hasn't been updated since May. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fornico ( talk • contribs) 17:26, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Should we move the boroughs section to its own article? It's quite long and I think it clutters up the page. Nsophiay ( talk) 14:27, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
I think the cases table could benefit from being smaller, size wise. It would probably be easier to read. CaffeinAddict ( talk) 01:33, 26 January 2021 (UTC)