This article was nominated for deletion on 22 November 2006. The result of the discussion was Keep.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Role-playing games Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

While not particularly important in the history of RPG's, CORPS was (is?) a commercially viable product that appeared on the shelves of many hobby stores. This page should not be deleted simply because its subject is more obscure than the average pen and paper RPG. The fact that the author of "Macho Women with Guns" and CORPS are one in the same should lend it some noteriaty.

• True, it was a commercially viable product and is still available as a PDF download like all other products from BTRC. It was part of the evolution of EABA

It looks like BTRC re-did CORPS as a gameworld for EABA v2 in 2013. Is there still a stand alone CORPS system any more? ^[1] Allegrorondo ( talk) 15:51, 27 January 2017 (UTC) reply