This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about
television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the
style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for
GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : *
Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) *
Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize
Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. *
Sport in the United Kingdom - the
Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Moved as proposed. As noted in the discussion, the slash is unavoidable in the overwhelming common name of the topic.
bd2412T00:57, 9 April 2019 (UTC)reply
CNN Sports Illustrated →
CNN/SI – Actual name of the network. The "SI" came from Sports Illustrated, which was a corporate sister to CNN at the time, but the network's name didn't spell it out. The slash is correct, even if it was omitted from the attached website's URL for technical reasons.
oknazevad (
talk)
01:40, 24 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment "CNNSI" is what the logo in the infobox shows.
CNNSI redirects here; avoids the problem with slashes in URLs and MediaWiki's interpretation of what that means. --
70.51.201.106 (
talk)
08:00, 24 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Re: to commentWP:SLASH is unavoidable when the subject is actually titled with a slash, like Victor/Victoria, Frost/Nixon and others. In this case, it is properly slashed, as seen in the refs, including the one from CNN themselves. The logo styling should not be taken definitively, as has been reinforced many, many times on Wikipedia.
oknazevad (
talk)
12:14, 24 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Support - The initialism with the slash is most commonly-used in sources referring to the network, and per
WP:NCBC#Networks, shortened forms or initialisms of their business names ... should be the primary way of naming the article. CNNSI (without the slash) seems to only be used when referring to the cnnsi.com website. --
Netoholic@19:54, 24 March 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about
television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the
style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for
GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : *
Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) *
Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize
Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. *
Sport in the United Kingdom - the
Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Moved as proposed. As noted in the discussion, the slash is unavoidable in the overwhelming common name of the topic.
bd2412T00:57, 9 April 2019 (UTC)reply
CNN Sports Illustrated →
CNN/SI – Actual name of the network. The "SI" came from Sports Illustrated, which was a corporate sister to CNN at the time, but the network's name didn't spell it out. The slash is correct, even if it was omitted from the attached website's URL for technical reasons.
oknazevad (
talk)
01:40, 24 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment "CNNSI" is what the logo in the infobox shows.
CNNSI redirects here; avoids the problem with slashes in URLs and MediaWiki's interpretation of what that means. --
70.51.201.106 (
talk)
08:00, 24 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Re: to commentWP:SLASH is unavoidable when the subject is actually titled with a slash, like Victor/Victoria, Frost/Nixon and others. In this case, it is properly slashed, as seen in the refs, including the one from CNN themselves. The logo styling should not be taken definitively, as has been reinforced many, many times on Wikipedia.
oknazevad (
talk)
12:14, 24 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Support - The initialism with the slash is most commonly-used in sources referring to the network, and per
WP:NCBC#Networks, shortened forms or initialisms of their business names ... should be the primary way of naming the article. CNNSI (without the slash) seems to only be used when referring to the cnnsi.com website. --
Netoholic@19:54, 24 March 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.