This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
CLODO article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
CLODO has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
September 2, 2022. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
CLODO's initialism is also a French slang term for 'bum' or 'homeless'? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
https://machinesinflames.com/1
Can someone check the rights on these newspaper articles. One or more would make excellent images for the article. Etriusus ( talk) 05:50, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Is been a while since I've put out an anarchist GA. I've been fostering the CLODO article for some time now and I'd love some constructive criticism on the page before I take it to GA review. Its a niche neo-luddite anarchist group that was operating for only 4 years. My main concern is its limited content and overall page layout. It appears GettyImages has the rights to images from their arson attacks, so that's a no go. I'm still planning on giving it some touch ups (especially the lead and links). Etriusus 04:28, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Hey! Here are some news clippings on CLODO uploaded by the wonderful comrades at Destructionist International and their documentary project about CLODO; "Machines in Flames". I think there are more but I do not know if they will end up here. SP00KY talk 03:21, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
The term Neo-Luddite is used various times in this article and keeps being used. To me this seems reductive and incorrect. This question is itself brought up in the CLODO Speaks piece under 'Aren’t you really a bit retro, like the machine breakers of the 19th Century?'. Another issue here is that if you actually go to Neo-Luddites and read the article we can see it merely takes a bunch of disparate things an tries to create out of them a coherent ideology, it really is not fit for purpose to the point that it does a dis-service to the articles linking to it. I felt I should get other peoples opinions here first as this might be a little bit contentious. Thanks. SP00KY talk 17:10, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Neo-Luddism distinguishes itself from the philosophy originally associated with Luddism in that Luddism opposes all forms of technology, whereas neo-Luddism only opposes technology deemed destructive or otherwise detrimental to society.actually fits with CLODO fairly well. Realistically though, that page needs serious work.
In March 1981, an IBM computer terminal at the Banque Populaire building in Toulouse was vandalized. While CLODO did not claim the attack, the newspaper Le Matin de Paris stated the attack was "reminiscent of the habits and customs of the deceased CLODO". [1]
References
- ^ Debois, Jean-Paul (1987-03-24). Toulouse : encore un ordinateur saboté [Toulouse: another sabotaged computer] (in French).
{{ cite book}}
:|work=
ignored ( help)
Based on the markings in the scan, this looks like 1987, not 1981, no? czar 12:28, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Kavyansh.Singh (
talk) 13:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Etriusus ( talk). Self-nominated at 01:30, 29 August 2022 (UTC).
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: None required. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
CLODO article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
CLODO has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
September 2, 2022. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
CLODO's initialism is also a French slang term for 'bum' or 'homeless'? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
https://machinesinflames.com/1
Can someone check the rights on these newspaper articles. One or more would make excellent images for the article. Etriusus ( talk) 05:50, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Is been a while since I've put out an anarchist GA. I've been fostering the CLODO article for some time now and I'd love some constructive criticism on the page before I take it to GA review. Its a niche neo-luddite anarchist group that was operating for only 4 years. My main concern is its limited content and overall page layout. It appears GettyImages has the rights to images from their arson attacks, so that's a no go. I'm still planning on giving it some touch ups (especially the lead and links). Etriusus 04:28, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Hey! Here are some news clippings on CLODO uploaded by the wonderful comrades at Destructionist International and their documentary project about CLODO; "Machines in Flames". I think there are more but I do not know if they will end up here. SP00KY talk 03:21, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
The term Neo-Luddite is used various times in this article and keeps being used. To me this seems reductive and incorrect. This question is itself brought up in the CLODO Speaks piece under 'Aren’t you really a bit retro, like the machine breakers of the 19th Century?'. Another issue here is that if you actually go to Neo-Luddites and read the article we can see it merely takes a bunch of disparate things an tries to create out of them a coherent ideology, it really is not fit for purpose to the point that it does a dis-service to the articles linking to it. I felt I should get other peoples opinions here first as this might be a little bit contentious. Thanks. SP00KY talk 17:10, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Neo-Luddism distinguishes itself from the philosophy originally associated with Luddism in that Luddism opposes all forms of technology, whereas neo-Luddism only opposes technology deemed destructive or otherwise detrimental to society.actually fits with CLODO fairly well. Realistically though, that page needs serious work.
In March 1981, an IBM computer terminal at the Banque Populaire building in Toulouse was vandalized. While CLODO did not claim the attack, the newspaper Le Matin de Paris stated the attack was "reminiscent of the habits and customs of the deceased CLODO". [1]
References
- ^ Debois, Jean-Paul (1987-03-24). Toulouse : encore un ordinateur saboté [Toulouse: another sabotaged computer] (in French).
{{ cite book}}
:|work=
ignored ( help)
Based on the markings in the scan, this looks like 1987, not 1981, no? czar 12:28, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Kavyansh.Singh (
talk) 13:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Etriusus ( talk). Self-nominated at 01:30, 29 August 2022 (UTC).
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: None required. |