This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Needs Citation — Preceding unsigned comment added by Littlewill1166 ( talk • contribs) 01:12, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Which one is the new name? It needs to be consistent. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mgw89 ( talk • contribs) 21:15, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
LEAP-X is the technology demonstrator. Production engines go by LEAP-1C, -1B and -1A. So I will remove the X from the names. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.189.29.109 ( talk) 00:45, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
It says 18,000 to 50,000. Are they really designing an engine with that wide a marin for thrust ratings? Mgw89 ( talk) 05:34, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
It seems that 16:1 is low, seeing as the CFM56 is at 32, and the trend is increasing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mgw89 ( talk • contribs) 07:24, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
The engine in the picture shows the wrong direction of rotation. Seen from the rear the engine has to turn in right-hand direction. However, the picture shows a left turning engine. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.88.97.209 ( talk) 08:21, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
What is the SFC (lb/h/lb) at cruising speed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fisch4Fun ( talk • contribs) 01:18, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on CFM International LEAP. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:44, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
"The troubled introduction of the PW1100G is making customers choose it and to power the A320neo " - I marked this as speculation but the original author has decided to remove the speculation mark. The cited article includes one point of view of one analyst, it is at best one opinion. Short of multiple citations by actual customers I think this is clearly a case of speculation. 85.159.97.4 ( talk) 11:33, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
The Thrust ratings table seems to have five significant digits. Are they really known that accurately? Gah4 ( talk) 06:30, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
{{convert}}
template is doing wrong, but it also seems to convert Mach to 5 digits. Default is supposed to match the input, but it doesn't.
Gah4 (
talk)
18:02, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
{{convert|1.6|Mach}}
Mach 1.6 (1,960 km/h; 1,220 mph) Even the people who work on {{convert}}
don't know why.
Gah4 (
talk)
19:38, 9 December 2020 (UTC){{cvt|1.6|Mach|40000|km/h kn|0}}
gives Mach 1.6 (1,700 km/h; 918 kn). Temperature would be even better, but hey.--
Marc Lacoste (
talk)
20:29, 9 December 2020 (UTC)This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Needs Citation — Preceding unsigned comment added by Littlewill1166 ( talk • contribs) 01:12, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Which one is the new name? It needs to be consistent. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mgw89 ( talk • contribs) 21:15, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
LEAP-X is the technology demonstrator. Production engines go by LEAP-1C, -1B and -1A. So I will remove the X from the names. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.189.29.109 ( talk) 00:45, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
It says 18,000 to 50,000. Are they really designing an engine with that wide a marin for thrust ratings? Mgw89 ( talk) 05:34, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
It seems that 16:1 is low, seeing as the CFM56 is at 32, and the trend is increasing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mgw89 ( talk • contribs) 07:24, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
The engine in the picture shows the wrong direction of rotation. Seen from the rear the engine has to turn in right-hand direction. However, the picture shows a left turning engine. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.88.97.209 ( talk) 08:21, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
What is the SFC (lb/h/lb) at cruising speed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fisch4Fun ( talk • contribs) 01:18, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on CFM International LEAP. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:44, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
"The troubled introduction of the PW1100G is making customers choose it and to power the A320neo " - I marked this as speculation but the original author has decided to remove the speculation mark. The cited article includes one point of view of one analyst, it is at best one opinion. Short of multiple citations by actual customers I think this is clearly a case of speculation. 85.159.97.4 ( talk) 11:33, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
The Thrust ratings table seems to have five significant digits. Are they really known that accurately? Gah4 ( talk) 06:30, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
{{convert}}
template is doing wrong, but it also seems to convert Mach to 5 digits. Default is supposed to match the input, but it doesn't.
Gah4 (
talk)
18:02, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
{{convert|1.6|Mach}}
Mach 1.6 (1,960 km/h; 1,220 mph) Even the people who work on {{convert}}
don't know why.
Gah4 (
talk)
19:38, 9 December 2020 (UTC){{cvt|1.6|Mach|40000|km/h kn|0}}
gives Mach 1.6 (1,700 km/h; 918 kn). Temperature would be even better, but hey.--
Marc Lacoste (
talk)
20:29, 9 December 2020 (UTC)