This article is written in
Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
CFB Shilo received a
peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
Untitled
IE has "crashed" this page on me TWICE now when I click "preview" to give it a look before saving. Both occurrences were after spending a lot of time writing the article. I may just make a CfD myself if it happened again.
Weaponofmassinstruction 05:11, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
More context, please.
The article needs a one line introduction and context info. What is a CFB, and why, as a random encyclopedia reader, do I care about it? Also, it should probably be linked to an article on the general topic of
CFBs. Looks like a good beginning, though.
JesseW 05:57, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Further introductory data added. Thank you for your suggestion.
If I may ask, is it that common for people to read encyclopedias randomly, expecting to find things they care about, or do most people use them as an organized information resource, containing the information they seek and a ton of information they could care less about, in order to make connections between their own known, unknown, and suspected knowledge?
Weaponofmassinstruction 05:28, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
People do both, really.
—
mark✎ 08:37, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
This article is written in
Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
CFB Shilo received a
peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
Untitled
IE has "crashed" this page on me TWICE now when I click "preview" to give it a look before saving. Both occurrences were after spending a lot of time writing the article. I may just make a CfD myself if it happened again.
Weaponofmassinstruction 05:11, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
More context, please.
The article needs a one line introduction and context info. What is a CFB, and why, as a random encyclopedia reader, do I care about it? Also, it should probably be linked to an article on the general topic of
CFBs. Looks like a good beginning, though.
JesseW 05:57, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Further introductory data added. Thank you for your suggestion.
If I may ask, is it that common for people to read encyclopedias randomly, expecting to find things they care about, or do most people use them as an organized information resource, containing the information they seek and a ton of information they could care less about, in order to make connections between their own known, unknown, and suspected knowledge?
Weaponofmassinstruction 05:28, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
People do both, really.
—
mark✎ 08:37, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)