This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has been under repeated political vandalism. Among other things, the description of CEPOS has been changed to a degree that indicates blatant political POV, incorrect things have been asserted about CEPOS, and CEPOS has been accused of Pseudo science without sufficient reference. These attacks have been carried out by ThomasNielsen42, whom I have given a first warning. I am placing this page on my watchlist.
Pontoppidan ( talk) 01:46, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Does anyone have some information on this source. I wanted to confirm it but, when I went to the site, it was just a general thing and I didn't see CEPOS (although it's possible I didn't look enough into it). Leefkrust22 ( talk) 01:15, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has been under repeated political vandalism. Among other things, the description of CEPOS has been changed to a degree that indicates blatant political POV, incorrect things have been asserted about CEPOS, and CEPOS has been accused of Pseudo science without sufficient reference. These attacks have been carried out by ThomasNielsen42, whom I have given a first warning. I am placing this page on my watchlist.
Pontoppidan ( talk) 01:46, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Does anyone have some information on this source. I wanted to confirm it but, when I went to the site, it was just a general thing and I didn't see CEPOS (although it's possible I didn't look enough into it). Leefkrust22 ( talk) 01:15, 13 December 2011 (UTC)