![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I think this article may need a change of emphasis; I think the rarely referred to historical context needs to come in a sub-paragraph rather than the lead, and more focus should be detailed on the constitutional nature of the various types of by-law. -- Legis ( talk – contribs) 11:14, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
I just added the link that a used removed. As an attorney, I refer my clients to the template I put a link to on wikipedia. Unlike most websites that strickly put crap legal templates on the web with google ads, the site I put a link to just provides good legal forms. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.145.87.119 ( talk) 22:18, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
What about this: By-Law on The Notification of The Technical Legislation and Standards between Turkey and the European Union? If an instrument with this name was adopted by a government (board of ministers), is this a wrong use of the word by-law or does this article just miss this kind of word usage? (I mean, this is neither local nor corporate by-law). 62.65.192.82 ( talk) 01:48, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
I came to this page looking for the difference between these two types of documents. Perhaps this could be a future update that is made. -- Robthepiper ( talk) 05:17, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Is Byelaw a valid alternate spelling to bylaw? Syd1435 23:38, 2004 Nov 22 (UTC)
Pacerier ( talk) 22:32, 28 February 2016 (UTC): ❝
❞
Agreed based on:
Sondra.kinsey ( talk) 16:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. ( non-admin closure) TonyBallioni ( talk) 18:49, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
By-law → Bylaw – Current most popular spelling of reliable sources Sondra.kinsey ( talk) 16:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on By-law. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:13, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I think this article may need a change of emphasis; I think the rarely referred to historical context needs to come in a sub-paragraph rather than the lead, and more focus should be detailed on the constitutional nature of the various types of by-law. -- Legis ( talk – contribs) 11:14, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
I just added the link that a used removed. As an attorney, I refer my clients to the template I put a link to on wikipedia. Unlike most websites that strickly put crap legal templates on the web with google ads, the site I put a link to just provides good legal forms. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.145.87.119 ( talk) 22:18, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
What about this: By-Law on The Notification of The Technical Legislation and Standards between Turkey and the European Union? If an instrument with this name was adopted by a government (board of ministers), is this a wrong use of the word by-law or does this article just miss this kind of word usage? (I mean, this is neither local nor corporate by-law). 62.65.192.82 ( talk) 01:48, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
I came to this page looking for the difference between these two types of documents. Perhaps this could be a future update that is made. -- Robthepiper ( talk) 05:17, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Is Byelaw a valid alternate spelling to bylaw? Syd1435 23:38, 2004 Nov 22 (UTC)
Pacerier ( talk) 22:32, 28 February 2016 (UTC): ❝
❞
Agreed based on:
Sondra.kinsey ( talk) 16:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. ( non-admin closure) TonyBallioni ( talk) 18:49, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
By-law → Bylaw – Current most popular spelling of reliable sources Sondra.kinsey ( talk) 16:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on By-law. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:13, 12 December 2017 (UTC)