This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hi, we obviously an issue here, HoldemPoker is a brand run by Ongame, and simply mentioning Ongames runs this brand does not in my opinion "cover it"
Is your issue more a brand like this should have its own page? Because if so PokerRoom and CasinoRoom should also have this but they don't. In fact both myself and Kchase02 a newpage patroller feels that this current way is a fair enough method.
I don’t understand why you think we should remove information; surely the whole point of Wikipedia is to be as concise as we can be about everything right? HoldemPoker is another brand, deleting it because it belongs to a larger company is nonsense right?
It would be like deleting a part about Lincoln because it belongs to Ford right?
Anyway I don’t believe removing information is the correct method, and I’d like to hear your compromise/thoughts on the subject. Thx. -- User:Davidlightman
I would have to say this is the first Wikipedia article I have read that has disappointed me, it reads like an ad for Bwin. I wonder how it has slipped through unnoticed? Take for example this: "bwin offers its customers more than 80 games..." I feel kind of soiled now, I'm gonna go home and have a wash. SpencerCollins ( talk) 12:23, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
I'm not really sure about this, and I'd strongly recommend removing this affirmation unless confirmed:
In November 2009, the city acted further by moving against sports stores which sold shirts from other teams (such as Milan and Real Madrid).[citation needed]
Is it actually true?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by CR34T1V31D34 ( talk • contribs) 05:52, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hi, we obviously an issue here, HoldemPoker is a brand run by Ongame, and simply mentioning Ongames runs this brand does not in my opinion "cover it"
Is your issue more a brand like this should have its own page? Because if so PokerRoom and CasinoRoom should also have this but they don't. In fact both myself and Kchase02 a newpage patroller feels that this current way is a fair enough method.
I don’t understand why you think we should remove information; surely the whole point of Wikipedia is to be as concise as we can be about everything right? HoldemPoker is another brand, deleting it because it belongs to a larger company is nonsense right?
It would be like deleting a part about Lincoln because it belongs to Ford right?
Anyway I don’t believe removing information is the correct method, and I’d like to hear your compromise/thoughts on the subject. Thx. -- User:Davidlightman
I would have to say this is the first Wikipedia article I have read that has disappointed me, it reads like an ad for Bwin. I wonder how it has slipped through unnoticed? Take for example this: "bwin offers its customers more than 80 games..." I feel kind of soiled now, I'm gonna go home and have a wash. SpencerCollins ( talk) 12:23, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
I'm not really sure about this, and I'd strongly recommend removing this affirmation unless confirmed:
In November 2009, the city acted further by moving against sports stores which sold shirts from other teams (such as Milan and Real Madrid).[citation needed]
Is it actually true?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by CR34T1V31D34 ( talk • contribs) 05:52, 29 December 2010 (UTC)