From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
Dana boomer (
talk ·
contribs)
19:05, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
reply
Hi! I'll take this article for review, and should have my full comments up by tomorrow.
Dana boomer (
talk)
19:05, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
reply
-
GA review (see
here for what the criteria are, and
here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):
b (
MoS for
lead,
layout,
word choice,
fiction, and
lists):
- References, should the Nunez ref "The Spanish-American war" be "The Spanish-American War"?
- Yup - probably forgot to fix it when I copied it from google books.
- Lead, "Bussard and Falke were broken up for in 1912," - there's either an extra word or a word missing here.
- Lead, "but the remaining four ships remained in service" - remaining...remained (rather repetitive).
- General characteristics, "A layer of Muntz metal sheathing" Is Muntz a type of metal, or a brand, or something else? Anything we could link to?
- Yeah, I don't know why I forgot the link to
Muntz metal
- Service history, "never returned for an major dockyard work." Extra word?
- Probably started writing "returned for an overhaul" and then switched halfway through ;)
- It is factually accurate and
verifiable.
- a (
reference section):
b (citations to
reliable sources):
c (
OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (
major aspects):
b (
focused):
- It follows the
neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by
images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have
fair use rationales):
b (
appropriate use with
suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
-
-