This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from
http://www.n3p.org. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material . Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by
VRT volunteers, under ticket number
2006030210000256. This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-en wikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission. |
I am coordinator of N3P.org. We are a non-profit organization that promotes the use of shared data and business procedures. We grant free use of all tbe text published on our site.
One of our objectives is for the automation of business processes to be discussed using a common language. Rewriting this article using a different set of words would defeat this purpose. I respectfully request that this article be allowed to stand.
Just from a basic viewpoint, I think that the concept of Business Process Interoperability is much wider than just minimising human labour involvement. This article is focusing on a subset of the entire BPI range of possibilities. Is the single definition that we have on this article really an accepted maximum scope by most people. From reading a few of the references it seems that the overall possibilities may have the minimisation criteria as an end product, but they don't even mention it as a defining factor. Ansell 03:35, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
I have made two changes as a start to give this article a more general focuss. It seems "Business process interoperability" is an emerging concept since the 1990s. A lot of the current content, however, seems like original research. Take the previous first sentence for example:
I can't seem to find one single reliable source (on Google books) linking "Business process interoperability" to "human labor". Same with "Business process interoperability" and "to meet objectives"
It think there is no doubt that "Business process interoperability" and even more "process interoperability" is a notable subject, that deserves a good wikipedia representation. It seems like a good thing to just remove these kind of questionable remarks, and bring some reliable sources into this article. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker ( talk) 22:42, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Business process interoperability. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:14, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from
http://www.n3p.org. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material . Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by
VRT volunteers, under ticket number
2006030210000256. This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-en wikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission. |
I am coordinator of N3P.org. We are a non-profit organization that promotes the use of shared data and business procedures. We grant free use of all tbe text published on our site.
One of our objectives is for the automation of business processes to be discussed using a common language. Rewriting this article using a different set of words would defeat this purpose. I respectfully request that this article be allowed to stand.
Just from a basic viewpoint, I think that the concept of Business Process Interoperability is much wider than just minimising human labour involvement. This article is focusing on a subset of the entire BPI range of possibilities. Is the single definition that we have on this article really an accepted maximum scope by most people. From reading a few of the references it seems that the overall possibilities may have the minimisation criteria as an end product, but they don't even mention it as a defining factor. Ansell 03:35, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
I have made two changes as a start to give this article a more general focuss. It seems "Business process interoperability" is an emerging concept since the 1990s. A lot of the current content, however, seems like original research. Take the previous first sentence for example:
I can't seem to find one single reliable source (on Google books) linking "Business process interoperability" to "human labor". Same with "Business process interoperability" and "to meet objectives"
It think there is no doubt that "Business process interoperability" and even more "process interoperability" is a notable subject, that deserves a good wikipedia representation. It seems like a good thing to just remove these kind of questionable remarks, and bring some reliable sources into this article. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker ( talk) 22:42, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Business process interoperability. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:14, 27 July 2017 (UTC)