![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In Busabout Wagga Wagga you have managed to delete a valid cite and reinstate a dead one without ANY valid reason. Mo7838 ( talk) 12:34, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
I am responding to a third opinion request for this page. I have made no previous edits on Busabout Wagga Wagga and have no known association with the editors involved in this discussion. The third opinion process is informal and I have no special powers or authority apart from being a fresh pair of eyes. |
I have copy-edited the article which did end up including many of the suggestions of User:Mo7838. As far as sourcing the article goes, the general policy is that if a source does 'die' and cannot be retrieved through an archive service, than a new source needs to be found. However, this does not mean that we need to remove all previously sourced content the minute a source goes inactive. In this case the best course of action would be to find a reliable third party source that reflects the material being presented in accordance with WP:SOURCE. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 03:55, 30 April 2013 (UTC) |
Your Third Opinion request has been removed because the request did not comply with the requirement of the Third Opinion project page which says, "Before making a request here, be sure that the issue has been thoroughly discussed on the article talk page. 3O is only for assistance in resolving disagreements that have come to a standstill." Feel free to relist it if such a standstill is reached after thorough discussion. All forms of content dispute resolution at Wikipedia require talk page discussion before requesting assistance. Regards, TransporterMan ( TALK) 16:54, 26 August 2013 (UTC) (as 3O volunteer)
Couple of reasons why I believe there should only be one not two dates in the Foundation field of the Infobox:
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Busabout Wagga Wagga. Please take a moment to review
my edit. You may add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 22:20, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In Busabout Wagga Wagga you have managed to delete a valid cite and reinstate a dead one without ANY valid reason. Mo7838 ( talk) 12:34, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
I am responding to a third opinion request for this page. I have made no previous edits on Busabout Wagga Wagga and have no known association with the editors involved in this discussion. The third opinion process is informal and I have no special powers or authority apart from being a fresh pair of eyes. |
I have copy-edited the article which did end up including many of the suggestions of User:Mo7838. As far as sourcing the article goes, the general policy is that if a source does 'die' and cannot be retrieved through an archive service, than a new source needs to be found. However, this does not mean that we need to remove all previously sourced content the minute a source goes inactive. In this case the best course of action would be to find a reliable third party source that reflects the material being presented in accordance with WP:SOURCE. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 03:55, 30 April 2013 (UTC) |
Your Third Opinion request has been removed because the request did not comply with the requirement of the Third Opinion project page which says, "Before making a request here, be sure that the issue has been thoroughly discussed on the article talk page. 3O is only for assistance in resolving disagreements that have come to a standstill." Feel free to relist it if such a standstill is reached after thorough discussion. All forms of content dispute resolution at Wikipedia require talk page discussion before requesting assistance. Regards, TransporterMan ( TALK) 16:54, 26 August 2013 (UTC) (as 3O volunteer)
Couple of reasons why I believe there should only be one not two dates in the Foundation field of the Infobox:
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Busabout Wagga Wagga. Please take a moment to review
my edit. You may add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 22:20, 30 March 2016 (UTC)