This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
I've re-written this article entirely as the previous version by another editor was a copyright violation - pasted verbatim from the subject's web site. Future editors, especially those who are affiliated in any way (personal or professional) with Burak Bilgili must adhere to the following guidelines when editing it.
– Voceditenore ( talk) 06:03, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
It appears that user:Bbilgili and user:Avicenna23 have some objection to the inclusion of the artist's date of birth and to the fact that he made his Met debut as a last minute replacement for Michele Pertusi. I don't see how either of these facts (which are well cited) can be detrimental to the subject personally or professionally in anyway. On the contrary, this is the exact sort of information that should be found in an encyclopedia article on Bilgili. What are your thoughts Voceditenore? Singingdaisies ( talk) 06:18, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
One of these user names and these edit summaries [1], [2] strongly suggest that these users may have a conflict of interest in editing this article. Once again, I urge them to read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and Wikipedia:Autobiography before editing this article further.
– Voceditenore ( talk) 06:42, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
This editor has now three times removed the reference for his last minute assumption of Leperello at the Met where he was engaged as an understudy and added a totally inappropriate template to the middle of the page [3]. This has been reverted by two separate editors. User:Bbilgili, if you or 67.164.56.77 vandalize this page again, or any other page, we will have no choice but top take this to the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Please stop this. Voceditenore ( talk) 08:13, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
User:Bbilgili, You wrote in your edit summary:
This is the exact quote from the reference which you removed (Simon, Scott, "An Opera Understudy's Chance to Shine", National Public Radio, 15 May 2004):
The citation of the source does not require "licensing". In fact, citing a valid source is required by Wikipedia. Your addition of Template:Di-no license to the middle of the article is totally inappropriate. Your repeated addition of it to the article and the removal of referenced information and the reference itself constitutes vandalism. Please stop this. You have a complete misunderstanding of Wikipedia's policies. Please read the links at the top of this page and on your user page which explain them and please stop this behaviour. Voceditenore ( talk) 08:45, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Since User:Bbilgili has objected to the use of both "short notice" and "last minute" and the use of the word "understudy". Perhaps he can explain why and we can arrive at a wording that is acceptable to all editors. For example, are the following sources wrong? If so, in what way are they wrong? What evidence can he provide that they are wrong?...
In my view, it is misleading to the reader to leave out the circumstances of his Met debut completely. Frankly, they make Mr. Bilgili's success that night even more impressive. It's very unclear to me why User:Bbilgili wants that suppressed, especially on the grounds of "privacy". - Voceditenore ( talk) 12:16, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
I support the reversion by editor Singingdaisies of the removal of this reference. This is a perfectly acceptable reference to include in this article and, by his very name, the editor who removed it is somewhat suspect in having a possible conflict of interest. Viva-Verdi ( talk) 15:23, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
I've re-written this article entirely as the previous version by another editor was a copyright violation - pasted verbatim from the subject's web site. Future editors, especially those who are affiliated in any way (personal or professional) with Burak Bilgili must adhere to the following guidelines when editing it.
– Voceditenore ( talk) 06:03, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
It appears that user:Bbilgili and user:Avicenna23 have some objection to the inclusion of the artist's date of birth and to the fact that he made his Met debut as a last minute replacement for Michele Pertusi. I don't see how either of these facts (which are well cited) can be detrimental to the subject personally or professionally in anyway. On the contrary, this is the exact sort of information that should be found in an encyclopedia article on Bilgili. What are your thoughts Voceditenore? Singingdaisies ( talk) 06:18, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
One of these user names and these edit summaries [1], [2] strongly suggest that these users may have a conflict of interest in editing this article. Once again, I urge them to read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and Wikipedia:Autobiography before editing this article further.
– Voceditenore ( talk) 06:42, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
This editor has now three times removed the reference for his last minute assumption of Leperello at the Met where he was engaged as an understudy and added a totally inappropriate template to the middle of the page [3]. This has been reverted by two separate editors. User:Bbilgili, if you or 67.164.56.77 vandalize this page again, or any other page, we will have no choice but top take this to the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Please stop this. Voceditenore ( talk) 08:13, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
User:Bbilgili, You wrote in your edit summary:
This is the exact quote from the reference which you removed (Simon, Scott, "An Opera Understudy's Chance to Shine", National Public Radio, 15 May 2004):
The citation of the source does not require "licensing". In fact, citing a valid source is required by Wikipedia. Your addition of Template:Di-no license to the middle of the article is totally inappropriate. Your repeated addition of it to the article and the removal of referenced information and the reference itself constitutes vandalism. Please stop this. You have a complete misunderstanding of Wikipedia's policies. Please read the links at the top of this page and on your user page which explain them and please stop this behaviour. Voceditenore ( talk) 08:45, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Since User:Bbilgili has objected to the use of both "short notice" and "last minute" and the use of the word "understudy". Perhaps he can explain why and we can arrive at a wording that is acceptable to all editors. For example, are the following sources wrong? If so, in what way are they wrong? What evidence can he provide that they are wrong?...
In my view, it is misleading to the reader to leave out the circumstances of his Met debut completely. Frankly, they make Mr. Bilgili's success that night even more impressive. It's very unclear to me why User:Bbilgili wants that suppressed, especially on the grounds of "privacy". - Voceditenore ( talk) 12:16, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
I support the reversion by editor Singingdaisies of the removal of this reference. This is a perfectly acceptable reference to include in this article and, by his very name, the editor who removed it is somewhat suspect in having a possible conflict of interest. Viva-Verdi ( talk) 15:23, 11 September 2009 (UTC)