![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
![]() | This article contains a translation of Bugatti Automobiles from de.wikipedia. |
according to last autobild, bugatti built small car with w12 or v8, and not car like EB118
Now the veyron is a fine car, but what is the point of a car that does 253 mph if you can't use it on english roads? that is the problem, you see. You can not use supercars on everyday roads now so i'm sorry, but I wouldn't buy one if I were you.
thank you for your kind advice, sir. I was about to order a bugatti veyron but you have convinced me otherwise. i will now purchase a Dacia Sendero, what is your opinion of this automobile? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.255.182.174 ( talk) 18:17, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
I removed the "Issues" section introduced on this edit. Creating an entire section in order to highlight one customer's complaint is giving the issue undue weight. Also, WP:NPOV requires all significant points of view to be presented which means that any negative criticism of the company should be balanced out with positive criticism unless one notably outweighs the other which is not the case here. Also, "Issues" (plural) is misleading and incorrect; one issue only was presented. Big Bird ( talk • contribs) 21:10, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
The 'Top Gear' comment comparing the Veyron to the Concorde wasn't just comparing it as a feat of technology, but as a summit marker that would never be surpassed - airliners since Concorde and cars post-Veyron would no longer push the limits of the achievable. The A380 or 787 may be fine modern machines but they aren't inspiring the way the Concorde was. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.193.44.80 ( talk) 11:08, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
Is this a one-off, or a production car? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-47469562 John a s ( talk) 13:56, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Does Bugatti now belong to Rimac? -- 37.144.245.248 ( talk) 15:06, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: consensus against move. —usernamekiran (talk) 12:19, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
– Per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC and WP:COMMONNAME, most people who search for "Bugatti" are most likely going to be looking for this company, the modern one, rather than the original defunct one founded by Ettore Bugatti. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:07, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
![]() | This article contains a translation of Bugatti Automobiles from de.wikipedia. |
according to last autobild, bugatti built small car with w12 or v8, and not car like EB118
Now the veyron is a fine car, but what is the point of a car that does 253 mph if you can't use it on english roads? that is the problem, you see. You can not use supercars on everyday roads now so i'm sorry, but I wouldn't buy one if I were you.
thank you for your kind advice, sir. I was about to order a bugatti veyron but you have convinced me otherwise. i will now purchase a Dacia Sendero, what is your opinion of this automobile? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.255.182.174 ( talk) 18:17, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
I removed the "Issues" section introduced on this edit. Creating an entire section in order to highlight one customer's complaint is giving the issue undue weight. Also, WP:NPOV requires all significant points of view to be presented which means that any negative criticism of the company should be balanced out with positive criticism unless one notably outweighs the other which is not the case here. Also, "Issues" (plural) is misleading and incorrect; one issue only was presented. Big Bird ( talk • contribs) 21:10, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
The 'Top Gear' comment comparing the Veyron to the Concorde wasn't just comparing it as a feat of technology, but as a summit marker that would never be surpassed - airliners since Concorde and cars post-Veyron would no longer push the limits of the achievable. The A380 or 787 may be fine modern machines but they aren't inspiring the way the Concorde was. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.193.44.80 ( talk) 11:08, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
Is this a one-off, or a production car? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-47469562 John a s ( talk) 13:56, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Does Bugatti now belong to Rimac? -- 37.144.245.248 ( talk) 15:06, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: consensus against move. —usernamekiran (talk) 12:19, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
– Per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC and WP:COMMONNAME, most people who search for "Bugatti" are most likely going to be looking for this company, the modern one, rather than the original defunct one founded by Ettore Bugatti. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:07, 28 November 2022 (UTC)