GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 13:30, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I'll take this one. Should complete this within a day or two ☯
Jag
uar ☯
13:30, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Overall this is a well written article with very few prose issues to point out. The only thing I could find were some organisational questions, and something that could be added in the lead. This shouldn't be too hard to address. I'll leave this on hold for the standard seven days, thanks! ☯ Jag uar ☯ 19:42, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for addressing them in time, looks like it is a good GA candidate in its own right. I believe they have all been addressed, so promoting ☯
Jag
uar ☯
19:45, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 13:30, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I'll take this one. Should complete this within a day or two ☯
Jag
uar ☯
13:30, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Overall this is a well written article with very few prose issues to point out. The only thing I could find were some organisational questions, and something that could be added in the lead. This shouldn't be too hard to address. I'll leave this on hold for the standard seven days, thanks! ☯ Jag uar ☯ 19:42, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for addressing them in time, looks like it is a good GA candidate in its own right. I believe they have all been addressed, so promoting ☯
Jag
uar ☯
19:45, 24 February 2015 (UTC)