This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Musical Instruments, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
musical instruments on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Musical InstrumentsWikipedia:WikiProject Musical InstrumentsTemplate:WikiProject Musical Instrumentsmusical instruments articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our
project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our
talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
The merge suggestion is not a good one. To dot our T's and cross our I's, in the original Latin,
the passage in Vegetius, what is rendered "cornet" in the quote given in English in the article
Cornu is in fact cornu: yes, they were distinct, although of the same family.
Bill 12:08, 24 February 2006 (UTC)reply
May be then we should change articles to state so? Not "same as", but "similar to"? --
GreyCat 22:46, 24 February 2006 (UTC)reply
I agree that the merge suggestion is not a good one. They are distinct objects, and their entries should remain separate to reflect that.
Just to point out, the picture on the right is actually a cornu, not a bucina... —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
81.146.35.50 (
talk) 09:52, 28 October 2008 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Musical Instruments, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
musical instruments on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Musical InstrumentsWikipedia:WikiProject Musical InstrumentsTemplate:WikiProject Musical Instrumentsmusical instruments articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our
project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our
talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
The merge suggestion is not a good one. To dot our T's and cross our I's, in the original Latin,
the passage in Vegetius, what is rendered "cornet" in the quote given in English in the article
Cornu is in fact cornu: yes, they were distinct, although of the same family.
Bill 12:08, 24 February 2006 (UTC)reply
May be then we should change articles to state so? Not "same as", but "similar to"? --
GreyCat 22:46, 24 February 2006 (UTC)reply
I agree that the merge suggestion is not a good one. They are distinct objects, and their entries should remain separate to reflect that.
Just to point out, the picture on the right is actually a cornu, not a bucina... —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
81.146.35.50 (
talk) 09:52, 28 October 2008 (UTC)reply