This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I took this picture last week: [1] It looks like the Brugmansia lives quite well in Cagliari too.
Cheers G.
Link doesn't allow access to your private file —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.134.16.93 ( talk) 21:27, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Here is the link: http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Sky-News-Archive/Article/200828512802237
I think the case reports are anedoctal and unnecessary.
71.129.172.169 (
talk) 05:53, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
So, it's recommended for women only. Gzuckier ( talk) 17:12, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Is a bolded 'warning' section necessary to this article? Many other poisonous plants are common in gardens, and yet they do not have a similar section. Maybe we should add this warning to every plant section, including tomatoes, since as we all know, the leaves contain a toxic alkaloid. Apothecia ( talk) 01:53, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
I changed the following: "known as Angel's Trumpets, incorrectly sharing that name in the past with the closely related genus Datura, commonly known as "Thorn Apple".". How can a common name be incorrect? If people are calling the plant by that name, then it is de facto correct (would be good to have a citation of the usage though). It may be confusing to call both Musa and Plantago "plantain". Calling a plant which is not in Abies a "Douglas Fir" might be botanically inaccurate. However, as long as people use these names, they are not "incorrect". 192.104.39.2 ( talk) 21:34, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Abads1, I have reverted your recent edits for mistakes including improper name changes to picture headings, improper use of x hybrid symbol, improperly minimizing toxicity to equal all Solanacea, poor grammer, and superfulous added phrases. Would you consider starting your user page so that we have a place to post messages to you? I would also appreciate if you would identify yourself, since your user name associates you with ABADS, which I am a part of, but I am sure you are not. Normally that wouldn't be a problem, but you have been using your edits to hide sabatoge to links to other brugmansia forums, such as removing the BGI link and changing the Cubits forum link just a little so it wouldn't work. Tom Hulse ( talk) 06:48, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
What pollinates these flowers in their native environments? Insects? Bats? This would be useful information to add. Actually I doubt bats as this plant is toxic to mammals. Nutster ( talk) 15:00, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
Abads1, I reverted your edits again for vandalism. The worst is sneaking a link to your site, Ibrugs, into the link for every single photo in the gallery section. Also removing/vandalising the link of a competitor (cubits.org), vandalising the link of another competitor (BGI) to minimize their importance next to you, rewording the registration section to make it look like Ibrugs was designated in the ICNCP as Registrar (it wasn't), and also messing up species and cultivar names with improper puctuation & capitalization. If you would only consider honorably joining the discussion and selecting a user name that isn't a fib in itself, instead of sneaking in the background with untruths & sabatoge, you might find the editors here very friendly and it might actually help your site (Ibrugs) much more. Ibrugs is a great site, but you are harming it with your dishonorable actions. Tom Hulse ( talk) 19:28, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
I uploaded a major rewrite to the Brugmansia page, so I would welcome your criticisms & comments. I tried to closely follow the Wikipedia:WikiProject Plants/Template, so the sections & headings have changed, and some new ones were added. I've also removed a small amount of content, following recommendations at the Plants template, WP:NOT, and WP:EL. I've added sources for almost every significant claim in the article, but I would of course welcome your opinions regarding their reliability. The Toxicity section is much more serious in showing the harmful effects than it was, and I'm sure some will object to that, but it does IMO reflect the consensus of reliable sources; although it is of course up for discussion. I had hoped to add a comment about the relative safety of growing these as garden ornamentals, but had trouble finding a good source... please let me know if you are aware of one. -- Tom Hulse ( talk) 09:02, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Right -what I'd do....
Anyway, just some stuff to consider content-wise. Have not checked toxicology for journals etc. yet. Casliber ( talk · contribs) 23:57, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Brugmansia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:03, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I took this picture last week: [1] It looks like the Brugmansia lives quite well in Cagliari too.
Cheers G.
Link doesn't allow access to your private file —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.134.16.93 ( talk) 21:27, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Here is the link: http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Sky-News-Archive/Article/200828512802237
I think the case reports are anedoctal and unnecessary.
71.129.172.169 (
talk) 05:53, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
So, it's recommended for women only. Gzuckier ( talk) 17:12, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Is a bolded 'warning' section necessary to this article? Many other poisonous plants are common in gardens, and yet they do not have a similar section. Maybe we should add this warning to every plant section, including tomatoes, since as we all know, the leaves contain a toxic alkaloid. Apothecia ( talk) 01:53, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
I changed the following: "known as Angel's Trumpets, incorrectly sharing that name in the past with the closely related genus Datura, commonly known as "Thorn Apple".". How can a common name be incorrect? If people are calling the plant by that name, then it is de facto correct (would be good to have a citation of the usage though). It may be confusing to call both Musa and Plantago "plantain". Calling a plant which is not in Abies a "Douglas Fir" might be botanically inaccurate. However, as long as people use these names, they are not "incorrect". 192.104.39.2 ( talk) 21:34, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Abads1, I have reverted your recent edits for mistakes including improper name changes to picture headings, improper use of x hybrid symbol, improperly minimizing toxicity to equal all Solanacea, poor grammer, and superfulous added phrases. Would you consider starting your user page so that we have a place to post messages to you? I would also appreciate if you would identify yourself, since your user name associates you with ABADS, which I am a part of, but I am sure you are not. Normally that wouldn't be a problem, but you have been using your edits to hide sabatoge to links to other brugmansia forums, such as removing the BGI link and changing the Cubits forum link just a little so it wouldn't work. Tom Hulse ( talk) 06:48, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
What pollinates these flowers in their native environments? Insects? Bats? This would be useful information to add. Actually I doubt bats as this plant is toxic to mammals. Nutster ( talk) 15:00, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
Abads1, I reverted your edits again for vandalism. The worst is sneaking a link to your site, Ibrugs, into the link for every single photo in the gallery section. Also removing/vandalising the link of a competitor (cubits.org), vandalising the link of another competitor (BGI) to minimize their importance next to you, rewording the registration section to make it look like Ibrugs was designated in the ICNCP as Registrar (it wasn't), and also messing up species and cultivar names with improper puctuation & capitalization. If you would only consider honorably joining the discussion and selecting a user name that isn't a fib in itself, instead of sneaking in the background with untruths & sabatoge, you might find the editors here very friendly and it might actually help your site (Ibrugs) much more. Ibrugs is a great site, but you are harming it with your dishonorable actions. Tom Hulse ( talk) 19:28, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
I uploaded a major rewrite to the Brugmansia page, so I would welcome your criticisms & comments. I tried to closely follow the Wikipedia:WikiProject Plants/Template, so the sections & headings have changed, and some new ones were added. I've also removed a small amount of content, following recommendations at the Plants template, WP:NOT, and WP:EL. I've added sources for almost every significant claim in the article, but I would of course welcome your opinions regarding their reliability. The Toxicity section is much more serious in showing the harmful effects than it was, and I'm sure some will object to that, but it does IMO reflect the consensus of reliable sources; although it is of course up for discussion. I had hoped to add a comment about the relative safety of growing these as garden ornamentals, but had trouble finding a good source... please let me know if you are aware of one. -- Tom Hulse ( talk) 09:02, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Right -what I'd do....
Anyway, just some stuff to consider content-wise. Have not checked toxicology for journals etc. yet. Casliber ( talk · contribs) 23:57, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Brugmansia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:03, 9 November 2016 (UTC)