This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Statistics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Mathematics Low‑priority This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Cite, please! Note that I don't believe you, but see WP:CITE. TIA--- CH 01:17, 11 December 2005 (UTC) reply

Is there a reason that the order of names is given as Bruck-Chowla-Ryser? Most books in design theory call this the Bruck-Ryser-Chowla theorem, presumably because the important case of projective planes was treated first by Bruck and Ryser, and only later was the theorem extended to all symmetric designs by Chowla and Ryser. Will Orrick ( talk) 17:50, 7 July 2008 (UTC) reply

Bruck–Chowla–Ryser theorem → Bruck–Ryser–Chowla theorem – The Bruck–Ryser–Chowla theorem is a generalization of the Bruck–Ryser theorem, which is the reason for the ordering of the names. I have never seen the ordering "Bruck–Chowla–Ryser" in any authoritative source. Currently Bruck–Ryser–Chowla theorem redirects to this page. It has a (very short) edit history. Will Orrick ( talk) 17:42, 13 May 2011 (UTC) reply

Moved. Jafeluv ( talk) 11:00, 20 May 2011 (UTC) reply