From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sources

Given that the article was previously deleted for inadequate sources, there should have been more than the three given here when the article was recreated (or at least first drafted in draftspace/userspace, as there was no rush for putting this version back in mainspace) I am no longer watching this pageping if you'd like a response  czar 03:54, 8 August 2017 (UTC) reply

The rush was to do it before the Google cache expired. Had I noticed the prod I would have removed it. I have additional offline sources that I will add. Philafrenzy ( talk) 07:49, 8 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Article title

Surely "philatelist" isn't the best term to describe the person. Why not have it located at the original title as Bruce Ronald Henderson anyway, so that the unnecessary parenthetical disambiguation can be avoided? -- Paul_012 ( talk) 20:10, 8 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Good idea. Philafrenzy ( talk) 20:54, 8 August 2017 (UTC) reply
No, bad idea indeed as per WP:MIDDLENAME. I note that there are no less than 20 British philatelists who have the disambiguator "philatelist"; what is possibly wrong with that in the first instance? I shall thus move the article back. Schwede 66 08:08, 24 February 2020 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sources

Given that the article was previously deleted for inadequate sources, there should have been more than the three given here when the article was recreated (or at least first drafted in draftspace/userspace, as there was no rush for putting this version back in mainspace) I am no longer watching this pageping if you'd like a response  czar 03:54, 8 August 2017 (UTC) reply

The rush was to do it before the Google cache expired. Had I noticed the prod I would have removed it. I have additional offline sources that I will add. Philafrenzy ( talk) 07:49, 8 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Article title

Surely "philatelist" isn't the best term to describe the person. Why not have it located at the original title as Bruce Ronald Henderson anyway, so that the unnecessary parenthetical disambiguation can be avoided? -- Paul_012 ( talk) 20:10, 8 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Good idea. Philafrenzy ( talk) 20:54, 8 August 2017 (UTC) reply
No, bad idea indeed as per WP:MIDDLENAME. I note that there are no less than 20 British philatelists who have the disambiguator "philatelist"; what is possibly wrong with that in the first instance? I shall thus move the article back. Schwede 66 08:08, 24 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook