This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Bronchus article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I think merging the articles would be appropriate.-- Jfurr1981 21:39, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
Whoever put that "numbered" picture up, please put the key for the numbers as well... At least in the picture's page. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
139.80.123.34 (
talk)
08:46, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
This article suggests that the cartilaginous rings in the trachea are complete, surely this is incorrect?
--
Sulleh (
talk)
20:12, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Needless fragmentation. Content is duplicated and Bronchus would benefit from this added material. Iztwoz ( talk) 20:29, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Needless fragmentation, and repetition. Bronchus would be the better for added content. Iztwoz ( talk) 20:33, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Needless fragmentation - material already covered on Bronchus page Iztwoz ( talk) 20:20, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Small subtopic of Bronchus - material already duplicated there Iztwoz ( talk) 20:28, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Bronchus article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I think merging the articles would be appropriate.-- Jfurr1981 21:39, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
Whoever put that "numbered" picture up, please put the key for the numbers as well... At least in the picture's page. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
139.80.123.34 (
talk)
08:46, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
This article suggests that the cartilaginous rings in the trachea are complete, surely this is incorrect?
--
Sulleh (
talk)
20:12, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Needless fragmentation. Content is duplicated and Bronchus would benefit from this added material. Iztwoz ( talk) 20:29, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Needless fragmentation, and repetition. Bronchus would be the better for added content. Iztwoz ( talk) 20:33, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Needless fragmentation - material already covered on Bronchus page Iztwoz ( talk) 20:20, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Small subtopic of Bronchus - material already duplicated there Iztwoz ( talk) 20:28, 12 August 2014 (UTC)