![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
An unlogged in user made a large number of edits, indicating:
We have had edit warring over the content of the box (including my suffering an annoying edit conflict that lost part of my work). I have restored the Lib-Dem and Green candidates (recently added and then removed). In one case, the name is credible; in the other, the editor is likely to be well-informed. I presume that the editor who reinstate the name of the Labour candidate knows. However for reasons given above, I will continue to delete any alleged independent candidiate, unless (possibly) a reliable source is cited. Peterkingiron ( talk) 21:10, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
I think that it is now as it should be. If the "independents" reappear, I suggest they be tagged with {{fact}}. I fear this is a problem that will arise with many constituencies until the election is formally called and candidate lists can be sourced from an website website or newspapers. Peterkingiron ( talk) 22:16, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bromsgrove (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:50, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
An unlogged in user made a large number of edits, indicating:
We have had edit warring over the content of the box (including my suffering an annoying edit conflict that lost part of my work). I have restored the Lib-Dem and Green candidates (recently added and then removed). In one case, the name is credible; in the other, the editor is likely to be well-informed. I presume that the editor who reinstate the name of the Labour candidate knows. However for reasons given above, I will continue to delete any alleged independent candidiate, unless (possibly) a reliable source is cited. Peterkingiron ( talk) 21:10, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
I think that it is now as it should be. If the "independents" reappear, I suggest they be tagged with {{fact}}. I fear this is a problem that will arise with many constituencies until the election is formally called and candidate lists can be sourced from an website website or newspapers. Peterkingiron ( talk) 22:16, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bromsgrove (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:50, 9 November 2016 (UTC)