 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What is it? A bird, a plane, a ship or a train/ Please say in lead para —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Light current ( talk • contribs) 22:00, November 5, 2005.
Why does the infobox picture not include the whole driving cab? 194.80.106.135 ( talk) 15:52, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
- Because somebody changed it. I have swapped it for the previous image which shows the cab. NRTurner ( talk) 09:01, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
This article is currently named in accordance the Wikipedia:WikiProject UK Railways naming conventions for British rolling stock allocated a TOPS number. A proposal to change this convention and/or its scope is being discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways#Naming convention, where your comments would be welcome. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avicennasis ( talk • contribs) 18:22, 10 March 2011
- This paragraph was added 2011 - I guess that discussion is now over ! --
Beardo (
talk)
12:51, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- @ Beardo: it was really a no consensus result. While the current title isn't exactly accurate, it is sort of the least worst option. - mattbuck ( Talk) 13:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on British Rail Class 375. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111010023053/http://www.bombardier.com:80/en/transportation/products-services/rail-vehicles/intercity-trains/multiple-units/electrostar---united-kingdom?docID=0901260d8001283f to http://www.bombardier.com/en/transportation/products-services/rail-vehicles/intercity-trains/multiple-units/electrostar---united-kingdom?docID=0901260d8001283f#
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120403040430/http://www.kentrail.org.uk/Class%20375%20&%20377.htm to http://www.kentrail.org.uk/Class%20375%20&%20377.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:46, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
- Seems OK Dr Sludge ( talk) 07:49, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Not major, but the diagram for the Class 375/9 is wrong. The First Class section is found at either end of the unit, not in coach 2 or 3. Could someone possibly change this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doomotron ( talk • contribs) 19:34, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know, i'll correct that Don't be afraid to be creative ( talk) 12:48, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
The Formation section in the infobox currently (Apr 2021) states:
375/3 - 3 cars per unit (DMOC-PTOSL-DMOS) 375/6 - 4 cars per unit (DMOC-PTOSL-MOSL-DMOC) (refurbished - (DMOS-PTOSL-MOCL-DMOS)) Others - 4 cars per unit (DMOC-TOSL-MOSL-DMOC) (refurbished - (DMOS-PTOSL-MOCL-DMOS)) 375/9 (refurbished) - 4 cars per unit (DMOC-PTOSL-MOSL-DMOC)
This implies that Class 375/3 is a dual-voltage pantograph fitted unit (ie PTOSL rather than TOSL), which I believe is incorrect.
Equally it implies refurbished units of sub-classes 375/7 and 375/8, listed as 'Others', and 375/9 are being converted to dual-voltage pantograph fitted (PTOSL vs TOSL) during refurbishment which I don't think is the case as it is mentioned in neither the Refurbishment section, nor the referenced Southeastern press release.
The listed refurbished formation for Class 375/9 also seems to fail to reference the combination of first class into the MOSL, making it a MOCL and the DMOC units DMOS. There are no references in either the Refurbishment section, or the referenced Southeastern press release to this not being done on the 375/9s as it is on all the other sub-classes.
I have no references to hand confirming all of this, but as it stands the information is definitely inconsistent between Formations, Refurbishment, and the Southeastern press relief quoted as reference. 86.8.177.103 ( talk) 16:54, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Technically, the PTOSL on the 375/3 should just be TSOL since despite having the pantograph well in place, it doesn't actually have a pantograph. WestRail642fan ( talk) 20:33, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Apparel 375601 hit a Tree and was driven by Richard Evans from the YouTube channel Dad Rail.-- I Like The british Rail Class 483 ( talk) 20:27, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
- You might have to give more of explanation here: Apparel? Why is tree in caps for the first letter? What's the significance? ..... The joy of all things ( talk) 21:20, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What is it? A bird, a plane, a ship or a train/ Please say in lead para —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Light current ( talk • contribs) 22:00, November 5, 2005.
Why does the infobox picture not include the whole driving cab? 194.80.106.135 ( talk) 15:52, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
- Because somebody changed it. I have swapped it for the previous image which shows the cab. NRTurner ( talk) 09:01, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
This article is currently named in accordance the Wikipedia:WikiProject UK Railways naming conventions for British rolling stock allocated a TOPS number. A proposal to change this convention and/or its scope is being discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways#Naming convention, where your comments would be welcome. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avicennasis ( talk • contribs) 18:22, 10 March 2011
- This paragraph was added 2011 - I guess that discussion is now over ! --
Beardo (
talk)
12:51, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- @ Beardo: it was really a no consensus result. While the current title isn't exactly accurate, it is sort of the least worst option. - mattbuck ( Talk) 13:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on British Rail Class 375. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111010023053/http://www.bombardier.com:80/en/transportation/products-services/rail-vehicles/intercity-trains/multiple-units/electrostar---united-kingdom?docID=0901260d8001283f to http://www.bombardier.com/en/transportation/products-services/rail-vehicles/intercity-trains/multiple-units/electrostar---united-kingdom?docID=0901260d8001283f#
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120403040430/http://www.kentrail.org.uk/Class%20375%20&%20377.htm to http://www.kentrail.org.uk/Class%20375%20&%20377.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:46, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
- Seems OK Dr Sludge ( talk) 07:49, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Not major, but the diagram for the Class 375/9 is wrong. The First Class section is found at either end of the unit, not in coach 2 or 3. Could someone possibly change this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doomotron ( talk • contribs) 19:34, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know, i'll correct that Don't be afraid to be creative ( talk) 12:48, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
The Formation section in the infobox currently (Apr 2021) states:
375/3 - 3 cars per unit (DMOC-PTOSL-DMOS) 375/6 - 4 cars per unit (DMOC-PTOSL-MOSL-DMOC) (refurbished - (DMOS-PTOSL-MOCL-DMOS)) Others - 4 cars per unit (DMOC-TOSL-MOSL-DMOC) (refurbished - (DMOS-PTOSL-MOCL-DMOS)) 375/9 (refurbished) - 4 cars per unit (DMOC-PTOSL-MOSL-DMOC)
This implies that Class 375/3 is a dual-voltage pantograph fitted unit (ie PTOSL rather than TOSL), which I believe is incorrect.
Equally it implies refurbished units of sub-classes 375/7 and 375/8, listed as 'Others', and 375/9 are being converted to dual-voltage pantograph fitted (PTOSL vs TOSL) during refurbishment which I don't think is the case as it is mentioned in neither the Refurbishment section, nor the referenced Southeastern press release.
The listed refurbished formation for Class 375/9 also seems to fail to reference the combination of first class into the MOSL, making it a MOCL and the DMOC units DMOS. There are no references in either the Refurbishment section, or the referenced Southeastern press release to this not being done on the 375/9s as it is on all the other sub-classes.
I have no references to hand confirming all of this, but as it stands the information is definitely inconsistent between Formations, Refurbishment, and the Southeastern press relief quoted as reference. 86.8.177.103 ( talk) 16:54, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Technically, the PTOSL on the 375/3 should just be TSOL since despite having the pantograph well in place, it doesn't actually have a pantograph. WestRail642fan ( talk) 20:33, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Apparel 375601 hit a Tree and was driven by Richard Evans from the YouTube channel Dad Rail.-- I Like The british Rail Class 483 ( talk) 20:27, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
- You might have to give more of explanation here: Apparel? Why is tree in caps for the first letter? What's the significance? ..... The joy of all things ( talk) 21:20, 19 September 2021 (UTC)