![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
According to [1] and http://www.therailwaycentre.com/Recognition%20Tech%20Data%20EMU/EMU_430.html there was 1 Tractor and one or two trailer units in the formation. The tractor units did have two motor coaches unlike other units of the time, giving 3000hp, they were more then capable of hauling two trailer sets Enotayokel 22:58, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
There are a few blanks in the preservation list. If you can fill them, please do. Biscuittin ( talk) 18:58, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Please see Template_talk:British_Rail_Locomotives#Pre_TOPS_numbers - the basic problem is that the template is linking via codes which aren't described or explained in the article, (as well as having codes that were never actually used).
Apart from being confusing there's the issue of reliability. If anyone can fix with reliable sources please.. Sf5xeplus ( talk) 18:10, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
This article is currently named in accordance the Wikipedia:WikiProject UK Railways naming conventions for British rolling stock allocated a TOPS number. A proposal to change this convention and/or its scope is being discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways#Naming convention, where your comments would be welcome. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avicennasis ( talk • contribs) 18:20, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
The image is captioned "33102 propelling a 3rd rail EMU from Weymouth, 1987". Wouldn't it be more likely to be propelling an unpowered 4-TC set even in 1987? I seem to remember the Weymouth trains were still 4-REP+4-TC+4-TC at that time with the leading 4-TC taken on by the Class 33 from Bournemouth. NB I've removed the which? template from the caption; realistically there is little chance of it being answered. Murgatroyd49 ( talk) 10:01, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
I've moved the distribution map to where it seems more logical. If you don't agree just uncomment the table style. Murgatroyd49 ( talk) 07:50, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
clear:right;float:right;
) because that's how I did it at other articles in order to optimise space. See for example
British Rail Class 20#British Rail where it sits nicely below the infobox at most screen resolutions. If the clear:right;
were omitted, then on some setups its right edge would sit to the left of the infobox, with its top edge just below the "British Rail" heading. See
this version, and if your screen is less than 1280px wide, try zooming out with Ctrl+- to see the problem - a big white gap to its right, and below the infobox. If float:right;
were omitted, it would sit on the left with a big white gap to the right. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk)
19:32, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
The image in the infobox has been tagged with a when? query. In reality this is never going to be answered so is there in point in having the tag? Murgatroyd49 ( talk) 17:37, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Does anyone have the withdrawal dates? Not the individuals and accidents, just a general range for the class. Thanks Andy Dingley ( talk) 18:15, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Do we really need all this stuff about meetings of the Electrification and Traction Committees? -- Redrose64 🌹 ( talk) 17:21, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Agreed. Definitely TLDR. 2A02:C7F:6A56:9D00:214B:110A:3D88:6C3A ( talk) 03:49, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
The class 33 first para says it is the most powerful Bo-Bo. This is incorrect. The Hymek class 35 is a Bo-Bo and is more powerful than a class 33. Compare Hp and tractive effort on wiki pages for classes 33 & 35.Also observers book of locomotives confirms same. I do not need a reply, just the text in the first para of class 33 wiki changed. 2A02:C7C:8B2E:5F00:49B8:ECED:942D:B181 ( talk) 11:37, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
According to [1] and http://www.therailwaycentre.com/Recognition%20Tech%20Data%20EMU/EMU_430.html there was 1 Tractor and one or two trailer units in the formation. The tractor units did have two motor coaches unlike other units of the time, giving 3000hp, they were more then capable of hauling two trailer sets Enotayokel 22:58, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
There are a few blanks in the preservation list. If you can fill them, please do. Biscuittin ( talk) 18:58, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Please see Template_talk:British_Rail_Locomotives#Pre_TOPS_numbers - the basic problem is that the template is linking via codes which aren't described or explained in the article, (as well as having codes that were never actually used).
Apart from being confusing there's the issue of reliability. If anyone can fix with reliable sources please.. Sf5xeplus ( talk) 18:10, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
This article is currently named in accordance the Wikipedia:WikiProject UK Railways naming conventions for British rolling stock allocated a TOPS number. A proposal to change this convention and/or its scope is being discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways#Naming convention, where your comments would be welcome. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avicennasis ( talk • contribs) 18:20, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
The image is captioned "33102 propelling a 3rd rail EMU from Weymouth, 1987". Wouldn't it be more likely to be propelling an unpowered 4-TC set even in 1987? I seem to remember the Weymouth trains were still 4-REP+4-TC+4-TC at that time with the leading 4-TC taken on by the Class 33 from Bournemouth. NB I've removed the which? template from the caption; realistically there is little chance of it being answered. Murgatroyd49 ( talk) 10:01, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
I've moved the distribution map to where it seems more logical. If you don't agree just uncomment the table style. Murgatroyd49 ( talk) 07:50, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
clear:right;float:right;
) because that's how I did it at other articles in order to optimise space. See for example
British Rail Class 20#British Rail where it sits nicely below the infobox at most screen resolutions. If the clear:right;
were omitted, then on some setups its right edge would sit to the left of the infobox, with its top edge just below the "British Rail" heading. See
this version, and if your screen is less than 1280px wide, try zooming out with Ctrl+- to see the problem - a big white gap to its right, and below the infobox. If float:right;
were omitted, it would sit on the left with a big white gap to the right. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk)
19:32, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
The image in the infobox has been tagged with a when? query. In reality this is never going to be answered so is there in point in having the tag? Murgatroyd49 ( talk) 17:37, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Does anyone have the withdrawal dates? Not the individuals and accidents, just a general range for the class. Thanks Andy Dingley ( talk) 18:15, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Do we really need all this stuff about meetings of the Electrification and Traction Committees? -- Redrose64 🌹 ( talk) 17:21, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Agreed. Definitely TLDR. 2A02:C7F:6A56:9D00:214B:110A:3D88:6C3A ( talk) 03:49, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
The class 33 first para says it is the most powerful Bo-Bo. This is incorrect. The Hymek class 35 is a Bo-Bo and is more powerful than a class 33. Compare Hp and tractive effort on wiki pages for classes 33 & 35.Also observers book of locomotives confirms same. I do not need a reply, just the text in the first para of class 33 wiki changed. 2A02:C7C:8B2E:5F00:49B8:ECED:942D:B181 ( talk) 11:37, 23 May 2024 (UTC)