From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Flickr as a reference

This article seems to have a lot Flickr references, which are generally unacceptable as per WP:USERGENERATED. - Kj cheetham ( talk) 18:34, 7 September 2021 (UTC) reply

You could remove the whole section, as was done at British Rail Class 01. -- Redrose64 🌹 ( talk) 20:42, 7 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Operation

The table at British Rail Class 02#Operation is unsourced, and lacks context - in particular, what date this information applies to. Compare the table at British Rail Class 20#British Rail, which is clearly stated as being for March 1974, and is moreover sourced. -- Redrose64 🌹 ( talk) 13:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Agreed. This page is poorly written in general, and the tables / lists are very repetitive. I've started trying to sort out the grammar / wording etc, but it needs a lot of work. For example, locomotives of this type aren't normally referred to as "units". To be honest, in comparison with other similar pages, it feels as though it needs a complete restructure, but I don't think I'm brave enough, or experienced enough as a WikiD editor, to attempt this. Mwsmith20 ( talk) 13:53, 6 August 2022 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Flickr as a reference

This article seems to have a lot Flickr references, which are generally unacceptable as per WP:USERGENERATED. - Kj cheetham ( talk) 18:34, 7 September 2021 (UTC) reply

You could remove the whole section, as was done at British Rail Class 01. -- Redrose64 🌹 ( talk) 20:42, 7 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Operation

The table at British Rail Class 02#Operation is unsourced, and lacks context - in particular, what date this information applies to. Compare the table at British Rail Class 20#British Rail, which is clearly stated as being for March 1974, and is moreover sourced. -- Redrose64 🌹 ( talk) 13:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Agreed. This page is poorly written in general, and the tables / lists are very repetitive. I've started trying to sort out the grammar / wording etc, but it needs a lot of work. For example, locomotives of this type aren't normally referred to as "units". To be honest, in comparison with other similar pages, it feels as though it needs a complete restructure, but I don't think I'm brave enough, or experienced enough as a WikiD editor, to attempt this. Mwsmith20 ( talk) 13:53, 6 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook