![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
In my opinion this should be lengthened and perhaps even made in to a separate article, if one visits the page of even a small airline the fleet an destinations are usually listed, why not here? 94.1.42.108 ( talk) 19:40, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
The svg logo, while very well drawn, does not feature the reflections of light on the red side of the ribbon in the way the official logo does. Colourlines ( talk) 15:53, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
If someone with time could look at these: http://news.businessweek.com/article.asp?documentKey=1376-LRRWPB6S972N01-1RMD4462PG4JUMQQSLKJTULMF8
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/09/19/britishairways-planes-idUSL5E7KJ3KA20110919
Fan Railer ( talk) 01:54, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello all,
I'm in the middle of a copy-edit at the moment and have noticed some discrepancies in the structure which might be revised.
There's some possible overlap between the "Corporate affairs" "Operations" and "Marketing sections", plus a lot of short sections that might be better included under a banner.
Operations
Marketing
"Airport lounges" and "Cabins" might go in either one.
"Merger with Iberia" --> Corporate affairs section
Best, -- Ktlynch ( talk) 11:25, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
This image needs updating. BA also flies to Nigeria, Ghana, Morroco. BA Subsiduaries (Comair) also fly to Botswana and Mozambique. 81.132.146.20 ( talk) 16:09, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
This article has been a GA since September 2009 but there are some issues which need addressing.
Cloudbound ( talk) 11:15, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
While this article is at GAR, I have some additional concerns, which are considerably more structural than those stated above:
These issues all concern criteria 1a, 3b, and to less degree, criteria 4. Specific issues include:
While perhaps none of the issues in isolation grave, in sum the article falls short of the criteria. Arsenikk (talk) 20:30, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
Hows the reassessment going? AIRcorn (talk) 06:01, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
WP:N states, "Notability does not directly affect the content of articles,..." Unscintillating ( talk) 18:35, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Its means the policy WP:N applies to the creation of articles and the articles as a whole, not the content. So you cannot use WP:N to arugue the point. -- JetBlast ( talk) 04:44, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
As you have not replied you agree that it is now not notable? -- JetBlast ( talk) 01:27, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
BA have now received their sixth 77W. But the article states that it has 2 more on order. Are there any sources about this? I've not read it anywhere?-- MJLRGS ( talk) 19:59, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
The first part of the article states that BA has 52 744s, but in the table below the number is 61 - the number of 777s happens to be 52. The "Fleet" paragraph states that "The airline introduced the Boeing 737 and Boeing 757 into the fleet in the 1980s", but the tables below don't list 757s. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.181.231.110 ( talk) 23:11, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
The section of the article titled 'recent orders' is very out of date. should either be deleted or updated — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.30.33.147 ( talk) 08:43, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Figures in the table are mostly unsourced. Strange, given that the article is currently a GA one. What to do?-- Jetstreamer Talk 11:02, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
In the fleet section, it looks like there is an argument in the number of aircraft. At times, it says there are 55 747-400s and at other times 57. Also the same problem with the 777-200ER: at times 43 aircraft, other times 46. I think the article should be semi-protected since this number of aircraft argument is getting annoying. 72.89.35.142 ( talk) 00:53, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Why have a separate stub for a subsidiary??-- Petebutt ( talk) 06:01, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I was wondering if some editors here could please help to expand the article British Airways Limited. Thanks -- JetBlast ( talk) 16:55, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I have removed a number of images. They are just simply not needed, there are plenty on in the article and are there just for decoration. Its cluttering the place up. Plus those who have slow internet speeds suffer a little. Thanks -- JetBlast ( talk) 23:16, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
At times I felt that I was reading the in-flight magazine of BA. There is a need to include some of the less savory aspects of the company, such as its problems with religious discrimination against certain faiths. Excluding the record of what took place with Nadia Eweida makes this article skewed and biased in favor of BA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.12.203.75 ( talk) 10:33, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
I beileve that there is an error regarding the seating capacities of 767's, since it shows only 1 - class and 3 - class (Business, Premium Economy and Economy) versions. However, I'm pretty sure that there are 2 - class (Club Europe and Euro Traveller) versions of this plane in the airline.
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
In my opinion this should be lengthened and perhaps even made in to a separate article, if one visits the page of even a small airline the fleet an destinations are usually listed, why not here? 94.1.42.108 ( talk) 19:40, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
The svg logo, while very well drawn, does not feature the reflections of light on the red side of the ribbon in the way the official logo does. Colourlines ( talk) 15:53, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
If someone with time could look at these: http://news.businessweek.com/article.asp?documentKey=1376-LRRWPB6S972N01-1RMD4462PG4JUMQQSLKJTULMF8
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/09/19/britishairways-planes-idUSL5E7KJ3KA20110919
Fan Railer ( talk) 01:54, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello all,
I'm in the middle of a copy-edit at the moment and have noticed some discrepancies in the structure which might be revised.
There's some possible overlap between the "Corporate affairs" "Operations" and "Marketing sections", plus a lot of short sections that might be better included under a banner.
Operations
Marketing
"Airport lounges" and "Cabins" might go in either one.
"Merger with Iberia" --> Corporate affairs section
Best, -- Ktlynch ( talk) 11:25, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
This image needs updating. BA also flies to Nigeria, Ghana, Morroco. BA Subsiduaries (Comair) also fly to Botswana and Mozambique. 81.132.146.20 ( talk) 16:09, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
This article has been a GA since September 2009 but there are some issues which need addressing.
Cloudbound ( talk) 11:15, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
While this article is at GAR, I have some additional concerns, which are considerably more structural than those stated above:
These issues all concern criteria 1a, 3b, and to less degree, criteria 4. Specific issues include:
While perhaps none of the issues in isolation grave, in sum the article falls short of the criteria. Arsenikk (talk) 20:30, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
Hows the reassessment going? AIRcorn (talk) 06:01, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
WP:N states, "Notability does not directly affect the content of articles,..." Unscintillating ( talk) 18:35, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Its means the policy WP:N applies to the creation of articles and the articles as a whole, not the content. So you cannot use WP:N to arugue the point. -- JetBlast ( talk) 04:44, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
As you have not replied you agree that it is now not notable? -- JetBlast ( talk) 01:27, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
BA have now received their sixth 77W. But the article states that it has 2 more on order. Are there any sources about this? I've not read it anywhere?-- MJLRGS ( talk) 19:59, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
The first part of the article states that BA has 52 744s, but in the table below the number is 61 - the number of 777s happens to be 52. The "Fleet" paragraph states that "The airline introduced the Boeing 737 and Boeing 757 into the fleet in the 1980s", but the tables below don't list 757s. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.181.231.110 ( talk) 23:11, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
The section of the article titled 'recent orders' is very out of date. should either be deleted or updated — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.30.33.147 ( talk) 08:43, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Figures in the table are mostly unsourced. Strange, given that the article is currently a GA one. What to do?-- Jetstreamer Talk 11:02, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
In the fleet section, it looks like there is an argument in the number of aircraft. At times, it says there are 55 747-400s and at other times 57. Also the same problem with the 777-200ER: at times 43 aircraft, other times 46. I think the article should be semi-protected since this number of aircraft argument is getting annoying. 72.89.35.142 ( talk) 00:53, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Why have a separate stub for a subsidiary??-- Petebutt ( talk) 06:01, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I was wondering if some editors here could please help to expand the article British Airways Limited. Thanks -- JetBlast ( talk) 16:55, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I have removed a number of images. They are just simply not needed, there are plenty on in the article and are there just for decoration. Its cluttering the place up. Plus those who have slow internet speeds suffer a little. Thanks -- JetBlast ( talk) 23:16, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
At times I felt that I was reading the in-flight magazine of BA. There is a need to include some of the less savory aspects of the company, such as its problems with religious discrimination against certain faiths. Excluding the record of what took place with Nadia Eweida makes this article skewed and biased in favor of BA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.12.203.75 ( talk) 10:33, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
I beileve that there is an error regarding the seating capacities of 767's, since it shows only 1 - class and 3 - class (Business, Premium Economy and Economy) versions. However, I'm pretty sure that there are 2 - class (Club Europe and Euro Traveller) versions of this plane in the airline.