This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Urban studies and planning This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Wales Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 05:54, 10 November 2007 (UTC) reply

I propose that That Roundhouse be merged into Brithdir Mawr. That house is interesting and significant not itself (as unusual amateur dwelling) but due to history of intentional community own it. But now an article about house is more explained and well-referenced than article about community. I think that's wrong. Alexander Roumega ( talk) 07:57, 20 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Oppose. That Roundhouse is notable for reasons of planning law, amongst other things. Brithdir Mawr is notable as an intentional community. The articles serve different purposes. Carbon Caryatid ( talk) 19:40, 15 March 2018 (UTC) reply

"Our three pillars are community, sustainability & education." - you'd think at least the editor would neutralize the POV — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.147.109.217 ( talk) 22:27, 10 February 2018 (UTC) reply