This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shouldn't this be a redirect to Monarchy of the United Kingdom? The term is already mentioned there, and is itself hardly deserves an article, as it is simply an example of a common linguistic construct. JPD ( talk) 22:23, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
On the contrary. If it were a common linguistic construct I wouldn't have added it. The distinguishment between Australian Majesty and British Majesty is a very fine (and important) one. You as an Australian ought to know that! -- Camaeron ( talk) 17:22, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Conversation elsewhere with Camaeron has made me think that Majesty would be a better merge target than Monarchy of the United Kingdom. Can anyone see a reason not incorporate this article (about perhaps the most common usage of the XXXic Majesty form) in that one? JPD ( talk) 10:30, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
I wasn't too offended by those articles being deleted as they are very rarely used, hence the lack of interest...But if you merge this article I will make more of a stand. Britannic Majesty is used a lot and really does need its own page...-- Camaeron ( talk) 17:39, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shouldn't this be a redirect to Monarchy of the United Kingdom? The term is already mentioned there, and is itself hardly deserves an article, as it is simply an example of a common linguistic construct. JPD ( talk) 22:23, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
On the contrary. If it were a common linguistic construct I wouldn't have added it. The distinguishment between Australian Majesty and British Majesty is a very fine (and important) one. You as an Australian ought to know that! -- Camaeron ( talk) 17:22, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Conversation elsewhere with Camaeron has made me think that Majesty would be a better merge target than Monarchy of the United Kingdom. Can anyone see a reason not incorporate this article (about perhaps the most common usage of the XXXic Majesty form) in that one? JPD ( talk) 10:30, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
I wasn't too offended by those articles being deleted as they are very rarely used, hence the lack of interest...But if you merge this article I will make more of a stand. Britannic Majesty is used a lot and really does need its own page...-- Camaeron ( talk) 17:39, 16 March 2008 (UTC)