Article(
|
visual edit |
history)·Article talk(
|
history)·Watch This article has been reviewed as part of
Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the
Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a
Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through
WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at
WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.
Ref #50 is dead, and ref #51 only mentions Billy Clark.
50 has been fixed, #51 supports the statemnet about Clark as he is not listed in #50
Records
"The season of 2006-07, Bristol Rovers are the only Football League club to play at the Millenium Stadium and Wembley Stadium in one season, a feat only Premier League side Chelsea FC could achieve." Doesn't make sense. The only club to do it, but Chelsea did it as well?
How about adding at the start of the section something like "The club has won the following honours:" and attaching the ref to that..........? --
ChrisTheDude (
talk)
09:37, 20 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Last access dates should be formatted consistently.
Gasheadsteve made a start, and I've amended the rest so that they all now read day-month-year (UK format), as well as applying cite templates to some refs which were missing these. I think I've caught all of them, as well as fixing a couple of broken links.
Bettia(bring on the trumpets!)09:10, 20 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Thanks everyone for dealing with this promptly and cheerfully. I've fixed one outstanding broken link, made all the citations consistent, and the issues I raised above have been addressed. I;ll update the article history to show that this article has been reassessed against the GA criteria and that it still meets them, so you ought not to be bothered again for a while at least. --
MalleusFatuorum15:34, 20 August 2009 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Article(
|
visual edit |
history)·Article talk(
|
history)·Watch This article has been reviewed as part of
Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the
Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a
Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through
WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at
WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.
Ref #50 is dead, and ref #51 only mentions Billy Clark.
50 has been fixed, #51 supports the statemnet about Clark as he is not listed in #50
Records
"The season of 2006-07, Bristol Rovers are the only Football League club to play at the Millenium Stadium and Wembley Stadium in one season, a feat only Premier League side Chelsea FC could achieve." Doesn't make sense. The only club to do it, but Chelsea did it as well?
How about adding at the start of the section something like "The club has won the following honours:" and attaching the ref to that..........? --
ChrisTheDude (
talk)
09:37, 20 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Last access dates should be formatted consistently.
Gasheadsteve made a start, and I've amended the rest so that they all now read day-month-year (UK format), as well as applying cite templates to some refs which were missing these. I think I've caught all of them, as well as fixing a couple of broken links.
Bettia(bring on the trumpets!)09:10, 20 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Thanks everyone for dealing with this promptly and cheerfully. I've fixed one outstanding broken link, made all the citations consistent, and the issues I raised above have been addressed. I;ll update the article history to show that this article has been reassessed against the GA criteria and that it still meets them, so you ought not to be bothered again for a while at least. --
MalleusFatuorum15:34, 20 August 2009 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.