Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
hamiltonstone (
talk)
01:42, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
This article is neutral, stable, well-written - no, excellently written - and fascinating. I have reviewed over sixty GAs and this, i think for the first time, is an article where i cannot find a single thing to improve or suggest amendment. At FA, i would be suggesting a hunt for a contemporary image of any of the key participants, or at least of a Bristol bus of the period, but at GA this is good to go. Excellent work.
hamiltonstone (
talk)
01:42, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
hamiltonstone (
talk)
01:42, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
This article is neutral, stable, well-written - no, excellently written - and fascinating. I have reviewed over sixty GAs and this, i think for the first time, is an article where i cannot find a single thing to improve or suggest amendment. At FA, i would be suggesting a hunt for a contemporary image of any of the key participants, or at least of a Bristol bus of the period, but at GA this is good to go. Excellent work.
hamiltonstone (
talk)
01:42, 6 January 2010 (UTC)