This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Brian Cox (physicist) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days

This   level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Musicians / Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance). Physics: Biographies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Biographies Taskforce. Astronomy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Rave ( inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rave, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.RaveWikipedia:WikiProject RaveTemplate:WikiProject RaveRave articles Electronic music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Pop music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United Kingdom Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

http://www.skepticcanary.com/2012/02/22/professor-brian-cox-stands-up-for-science/:

Sven Hargroth

March 11, 2012 at 11:26 pm

The phases of the Moon are caused by the Earth’s shadow:

Brian Cox wrote, “I apparently said in a radio interview that the phases of the Moon are caused by the Earth’s shadow, which is clearly bollocks! Unless I was talking about a lunar eclipse, I can’t understand what I must have been thinking. Probably the end of a long day.” [37] Steve C wrote, “Here’s a fact for you: Brian Cox believes that the phases of the Moon are caused by the shadow of the Earth falling on the surface of the Moon. This was broadcast on BBC Radio Wales on 19th January 2012. I have the recording if anyone wants it, and I have been trying to ‘undo’ this damage in conversation with people for weeks since. For me, any suggestion of scientific credibility he held prior to this collapsed in on itself instantly.” [38] Trailer for a radio programme on BBC Radio Wales this morning. It’s a phone-in item for programme guest Prof. Brian Cox. Little kid (sounded 5 or 6 years old) asks: Why is the moon sometime round and sometimes looks like a banana. Prof Cox: “That’s the shadow of the earth.”[39]

81.154.168.149 ( talk) 16:24, 29 October 2021 (UTC) reply

This is being fought out in the article's change history, which is clearly the wrong place for it.

How about discussing it here and reaching a consensus?

Nick Levine ( talk) 18:12, 8 December 2021 (UTC) reply

@ Nick Levine: the department of Physics and Astronomy at Manchester University refer to Cox only as "Royal Society Professor for Public Engagement in Science" in their online staff list [1]. There's no mention at the moment of him also being a professor of particle physics there. Do you think we should amend the lead of the article in line with this? Neiltonks ( talk) 10:32, 21 February 2022 (UTC) reply

@ Neiltonks: it’s tempting. But two editors do not a consensus make. Give it a couple of weeks, see if anyone objects? Nick Levine ( talk) 19:41, 21 February 2022 (UTC) reply

I cannot find a current reference that lists him with a different title. Clearly he was a professor of particle physics a few years ago. The Royal Society listed him as a professor of particle physics as recently as 2016 https://royalsociety.org/people/brian-cox-12855/, but that is the most recent source I found with that title. Allecher ( talk) 20:17, 21 February 2022 (UTC) reply

We can eliminate "Professor of Earth's Shadow" Clean Arlene ( talk) 01:02, 14 August 2022 (UTC) reply

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Brian Cox (physicist and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 27#Brian Cox (physicist until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 ( talk) 20:20, 27 October 2022 (UTC) reply

"Cox has been described as the natural successor for the BBC's scientific programming by both David Attenborough and Patrick Moore."

One is not a successor *for* something. I suspect this is intended to denote or suggest that Attenborough and Moore, (though the latter is tagged as unattested) have described Cox as "natural successors" to themselves, but that's not what the text says. I am inclined to delete the paragraph in its entirety: it's nothing more than celebrity gossip in any case. Sebum-n-soda ( talk) 17:20, 12 July 2024 (UTC) reply