Breonna Taylor has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 17, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This should redirect to the top of Shooting of Breonna Taylor, not a subsection. It's a disservice to the reader to not first see the lead of the article, which establishes who she is and provides background on the event she is unfortunately most associated with. There is no benefit to bypassing it.— Bagumba ( talk) 08:56, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
In Breona Taylor's "Adult Life" section, the current section describes her working as an emergency room technician "at UofL Health (Jewish Hospital)" with no citation. University of Louisville Health is a non-profit hospital acquired from Catholic Health Initiatives. These kinds of references(especially parenthetical ones e.g. (((globalists))) ) have been used to isolate and negatively associate the Jewish community with wider conspiracies (c.f. Protocols of the Elders of Zion). The overarching conspiracy is that Jews have deliberately plotted to control all public facets of life from media, to financing, to politics - including healthcare - for nefarious purposes. Historically, this rhetoric has escalated to distrust and dehumanisation that ultimately culminate in violence. 2600:100C:B242:2344:710A:2001:46A9:E89 ( talk) 03:01, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
The majority of sources used for this page refer to Ms. Taylor as a Black woman. Please explain why the continuous change to "African American"? Nickscoby ( talk) 07:22, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Nickscoby ( talk · contribs) 20:19, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: DeadlyRampage26 ( talk · contribs) 00:44, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I am going to start this review. DeadlyRampage26 ( talk) 00:44, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
The article is very well written. Spelling and grammar appear to be all correct and the content uses formal and understandable language for readers of the article. I noticed one thing that could be changed when it comes to the placing of photos, which I have now edited. The article has no primary source research, with most of the sources coming from American news sources. The article is also very well sourced given its size. I'm aware it isn't a criteria for GA, but the templates on the page are also informative and used well. The article is broad, but stays focussed on the relevant topic with regards to Taylor, with very informative and well written paragraphs on her university experience etc. The article maintains a Neutral point of view, and simply provides the information in an unbiased format, recognises the areas where two sides may differ. I would say the article is stable. The illustration is in a good quantity in ratio to the length of the article, and has informative and correct captions. I have just modified the layout of the images to better fit what I have seen on other GA articles. I don't think it is very controversial to say that there really isn't a reason not to pass this page. I think a review is supposed to take about 7 days, but I think I am going to pass this if anyone doesn't have a reason otherwise. As far as I can see it matches the criteria. DeadlyRampage26 ( talk) 01:09, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Breonna Taylor has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 17, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This should redirect to the top of Shooting of Breonna Taylor, not a subsection. It's a disservice to the reader to not first see the lead of the article, which establishes who she is and provides background on the event she is unfortunately most associated with. There is no benefit to bypassing it.— Bagumba ( talk) 08:56, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
In Breona Taylor's "Adult Life" section, the current section describes her working as an emergency room technician "at UofL Health (Jewish Hospital)" with no citation. University of Louisville Health is a non-profit hospital acquired from Catholic Health Initiatives. These kinds of references(especially parenthetical ones e.g. (((globalists))) ) have been used to isolate and negatively associate the Jewish community with wider conspiracies (c.f. Protocols of the Elders of Zion). The overarching conspiracy is that Jews have deliberately plotted to control all public facets of life from media, to financing, to politics - including healthcare - for nefarious purposes. Historically, this rhetoric has escalated to distrust and dehumanisation that ultimately culminate in violence. 2600:100C:B242:2344:710A:2001:46A9:E89 ( talk) 03:01, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
The majority of sources used for this page refer to Ms. Taylor as a Black woman. Please explain why the continuous change to "African American"? Nickscoby ( talk) 07:22, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Nickscoby ( talk · contribs) 20:19, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: DeadlyRampage26 ( talk · contribs) 00:44, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I am going to start this review. DeadlyRampage26 ( talk) 00:44, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
The article is very well written. Spelling and grammar appear to be all correct and the content uses formal and understandable language for readers of the article. I noticed one thing that could be changed when it comes to the placing of photos, which I have now edited. The article has no primary source research, with most of the sources coming from American news sources. The article is also very well sourced given its size. I'm aware it isn't a criteria for GA, but the templates on the page are also informative and used well. The article is broad, but stays focussed on the relevant topic with regards to Taylor, with very informative and well written paragraphs on her university experience etc. The article maintains a Neutral point of view, and simply provides the information in an unbiased format, recognises the areas where two sides may differ. I would say the article is stable. The illustration is in a good quantity in ratio to the length of the article, and has informative and correct captions. I have just modified the layout of the images to better fit what I have seen on other GA articles. I don't think it is very controversial to say that there really isn't a reason not to pass this page. I think a review is supposed to take about 7 days, but I think I am going to pass this if anyone doesn't have a reason otherwise. As far as I can see it matches the criteria. DeadlyRampage26 ( talk) 01:09, 17 July 2024 (UTC)