GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Pyrotec ( talk) 07:49, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
A short well referenced article, so its quick to review.
My only concern is the WP:LEAD, its a short article and an even short lead. The lead is OK as an "introduction", but as a "summary" (it should perform both functions) does it accurately reflect what's in the article? For instance:
Bearing in mind that the article is short, I see little point in insisting that informatation is presented in summary form in both the Lead and the infobox, as well as in the body of the article. So, I'm happy for information such as appointment, successor, feast day, etc, to appear in the infobox rather than the Lead.
Pyrotec ( talk) 09:33, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Congratulations on gaining another GA. Pyrotec ( talk) 13:55, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Pyrotec ( talk) 07:49, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
A short well referenced article, so its quick to review.
My only concern is the WP:LEAD, its a short article and an even short lead. The lead is OK as an "introduction", but as a "summary" (it should perform both functions) does it accurately reflect what's in the article? For instance:
Bearing in mind that the article is short, I see little point in insisting that informatation is presented in summary form in both the Lead and the infobox, as well as in the body of the article. So, I'm happy for information such as appointment, successor, feast day, etc, to appear in the infobox rather than the Lead.
Pyrotec ( talk) 09:33, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Congratulations on gaining another GA. Pyrotec ( talk) 13:55, 25 July 2011 (UTC)